Re: [pure-lang-users] null
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
agraef
From: John L. <joh...@gm...> - 2008-09-26 14:01:00
|
Well, I was thinking of the ternary conditional operator! I don't like it, but it does exist... On 26 Sep 2008, at 08:51, John Cowan wrote: > Albert Graef scripsit: > >> Comparing the benefits of the -? predicate syntax against user- >> defined >> operators, for me the latter far outweigh the former. > > I agree in general, but I don't know why would you want an operator > beginning with '?'. > > -- > John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan co...@cc... > We want more school houses and less jails; more books and less > arsenals; > more learning and less vice; more constant work and less crime; more > leisure and less greed; more justice and less revenge; in fact, > more of > the opportunities to cultivate our better natures. --Samuel Gompers > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in > the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > pure-lang-users mailing list > pur...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pure-lang-users |