Re: [pure-lang-users] null
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
agraef
|
From: me22 <me...@gm...> - 2008-09-25 15:38:53
|
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:37, Albert Graef <Dr....@t-...> wrote: > > Still I can't drag myself to like the idea that ? is an alphanumeric > when ! and . aren't. ;-) Any other ideas about a sane naming convention > for type predicates that does not require changes in the lexical syntax? > What about emulating the character classification functions in ctype.h, which I presume you have? Those are, in a way, type predicates... |