Re: [pure-lang-users] null

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

John Lunney wrote:
>> It certainly requires fewer explanations to people who aren't Lisp  
>> weenies.
> 
> I would understand the former immediately and not the latter.

Still I can't drag myself to like the idea that ? is an alphanumeric
when ! and . aren't. ;-) Any other ideas about a sane naming convention
for type predicates that does not require changes in the lexical syntax?

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag