Re: [pure-lang-users] null

[John L. <joh...@gm...>]

On 25 Sep 2008, at 03:59, John Cowan wrote:
> Albert Graef scripsit:
>> I'm undecided on this. Is matrix? x really that much easier to  
>> read and
>> understand than matrixp?
>
> It certainly requires fewer explanations to people who aren't Lisp  
> weenies.

I would understand the former immediately and not the latter.

John