Re: [pure-lang-users] row and col

[Eddie R. <er...@bm...>]

On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 03:22 +0200, Albert Graef wrote:

> No, I prefer it the other way round, e.g.
> 
> rows x = map (row x) (0..n-1) when n,_ = dim x end;
> 
> (Well, that's already in the prelude, but you get the idea...)
> 
> And note that you can also write map (flip row 0) [m1, m2, m3] to get
> what you want.

The other way occurs more. OK.

e.r.