Re: [pure-lang-users] row and col

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Eddie Rucker wrote:
> row x::matrix i::int
> 
> Is this backwards? Shouldn't it be 'row i::int x::matrix' so that
> row can be used in map, filter, and friends.
> 
>  > map (row 0) [m1, m2, m3];

No, I prefer it the other way round, e.g.

rows x = map (row x) (0..n-1) when n,_ = dim x end;

(Well, that's already in the prelude, but you get the idea...)

And note that you can also write map (flip row 0) [m1, m2, m3] to get
what you want.

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag