Re: [pure-lang-users] FastCGI

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

John Cowan wrote:
> The FastCGI interface keeps the language processor running rather
> than starting a new process for every incoming request, so it is
> much more lightweight.

Thanks for the information, I wasn't aware of this. In fact, being able 
to answer more than one request in a single interpreter instance was one 
of the main advantages of the Q Apache module, so I'm rather happy that 
there's another, simpler way to achieve that! This will be even more 
important for Pure, since compilation times are longer, being traded for 
much shorter execution times.

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag