Re: [pure-lang-users] complex 0

[Eddie R. <er...@bm...>]

On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 20:14 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Albert Graef scripsit:
> 
> > - The divisor should be promoted to a complex 0.0+:0.0 in the first 
> > case, so you get nan+:nan in either case.
> 
> Division with slash effectively promotes its arguments to floats, so
> 0.0 should be promoted to 0.0+:0.0.

Allrighty then! I know Albert already has enough flies to swat without
me fanning the turds :( Sorry.

e.r.