Re: [pure-lang-users] pure won't complile anymore

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Albert Graef wrote:
> (I also changed the <<external object>> notation, which could be 
> mistaken as ordinary expression syntax, to those double curly braces 
> which aren't -- and won't be -- legal Pure. If anyone has a better 
> suggestion, or prefers it the way it was, I'd like to hear about it.)

Well, actually that turned out to be a bad idea as well, so I changed it 
to the #<...> syntax which should be familiar to Schemers. This won't 
parse as a Pure expression no matter in which context (although you 
might still fool the interpreter by declaring an '#<' operator, oh well).

(Note that this is all about print syntax only, so it doesn't affect any 
programs except possibly the regression tests.)

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag