Re: [pure-lang-users] pure won't complile anymore

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Eddie Rucker wrote:
> How about lr for list rules.

It's not only rules that can be listed, but also variable and constant 
definitions, as well as assembler code and other information. In fact, 
with -s no rules will be listed at all.

Anyway, John convinced me that this command is too important to fall 
victim to an acronym. And 'show' isn't bad at all, so I changed it to 
that now. That's already in svn.

I think it would be a good idea to warn the programmer when he uses one 
of these special commands as an ordinary identifier in his programs, 
even though they're not really keywords of the language. That should 
make it easier for people who are not familiar with the interactive 
command language yet. Those warnings could be restricted to interactive 
mode, so that they wouldn't bother you with a program that's only run in 
batch mode.

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag