Re: [pure-lang-users] C macros

[Eddie R. <er...@bm...>]

Doesn't built in complex seem kind of excessive for "systems programming?"

e.r.

On Sun 31/08/08  9:45 AM , Eddie Rucker er...@bm... sent:
> Here is the reference.
> 
> http://books.google.com/books?id=svQJ7itfcGUC&pg=PA28&lpg=PA28&dq=C99+complex+internal+repres
> entation&source=web&ots=0WpWVAZc9A&sig=NiX9RVOnpX6I01BHR_aIlfsZ
> Xlc&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result
> Notice the title "C in a Nutshell." Sound familiar ;-)
> 
> e.r.
> 
> On Sat 30/08/08  7:33 PM , Albert Graef Dr.Graef
> @t-online.de sent:> Eddie Rucker wrote:
> > > Complex is indeed two doubles. I don't have
> the> docs in front of me but I think it was defined
> double z[2];> Now that's really simple. Then why the heck do
> they have all that mumbo> jumbo in the ISO C99 spec? To scare people of
> from using them? ;-)> 
> > -- 
> > Dr. Albert Gr"af
> > Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz,
> Germany> Email:  Dr.Graef
> > @t-online.de, ag...@mu...WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag> 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>