Re: [pure-lang-users] C macros

[Eddie R. <er...@bm...>]

On Sat 30/08/08  7:33 PM , Albert Graef Dr....@t-... sent:
> Eddie Rucker wrote:
> > Complex is indeed two doubles. I don't have the
> docs in front of me but I think it was defined double z[2];
> Now that's really simple. Then why the heck do they have all that mumbo
> jumbo in the ISO C99 spec? To scare people of from using them? ;-)

I cannot find the source code? I would have thought it would have been defined like
struct { double real; double imag} complex but I think it was double z[2]. I'll do some more searching.

e.r.