Re: [pure-lang-users] case

[John C. <co...@cc...>]

Albert Graef scripsit:

> The problem is how to decide which symbols on the lhs of that equation 
> are literal (function or constant) symbols, and which are the variables 
> which are to be bound by the equation.

How about some syntax, loosely analogous to Common Lisp's #' that
indicates that the following symbol is to be interpreted as a function
in this particular use?  This would make the symbol locally nullary.

-- 
What asininity could I have uttered     John Cowan <co...@cc...>
that they applaud me thus?              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --Phocion, Greek orator