Re: [pure-lang-users] case

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Eddie Rucker wrote:
> Actually the thingy I sent was bad. (m, setter) should have been (m,
> set) like in the following. Since set is local to matrix and we have
> lexical scoping, I see no problem.

Yes, I missed that. But you could still simplify your definition, by 
just making gsl_matrix_set promote integer arguments to double. I don't 
see why you need that type argument to the setter function at all.

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag