Re: [pure-lang-users] math.pure

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Albert Graef wrote:
> Yeah, part of that surely is the same issue as with sqrt et al (missing 
> nanp check). That should be fixed now (r560).

I should mention that r560 also moves inf, nan and the correpsonding 
predicates to primitives.pure, so that they are available without having 
to load math.pure now.

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag