Re: [pure-lang-users] Yet another quirk with MinGW

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

John Cowan wrote:
> 9/0 is indeed inf, though 9%0 ought to be an error (in Q it's inf).

Not so in Pure, it raises a 'signal SIGFPE' exception there (as does 9 
div 0).

I agree that the way this case is implemented in Q just doesn't make any 
sense.

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag