Re: [pure-lang-users] Proposed syntax changes

[Eddie R. <er...@bm...>]

Should the rule

  a%b = a if b == 1 || b == 1L;

be added to math.pure or should this be defined by the user?

e.r.

On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 08:02 -0500, Eddie Rucker wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 14:08 +0200, Albert Graef wrote:
> > Albert Graef wrote:
> > > - The discussion I had with Libor about how to implement a sequencing 
> > > operator ("first x, then y") also kept me thinking, because the solution 
> > > I proposed there is not tail-recursive. To do this in a proper way, we'd 
> > > need a built-in sequencing operator (special form). While it's not 
> > > strictly needed, it's much more convenient than having to write 'y when 
> > > _ = x end' all the time.
> > 
> > This is now implemented as well. ($$ operator)
> > 
> > I'm basically through with my 0.5 TODO list now (Windows port 
> > notwithstanding; I can hopefully take a look at that later today). So if 
> > anyone is still listening, it would be nice if you could take the latest 
> > svn for a test drive. ;-)
> > 
> > I also vaguely recall that someone volunteered to write a little test 
> > module for math.pure, or did I just dream that up? :)
> 
> Was that me? I'll see what I can do ASAP.
> 
> e.r.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> pure-lang-users mailing list
> pur...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pure-lang-users