Re: [pure-lang-users] Proposed syntax changes

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Albert Graef wrote:
> - The discussion I had with Libor about how to implement a sequencing 
> operator ("first x, then y") also kept me thinking, because the solution 
> I proposed there is not tail-recursive. To do this in a proper way, we'd 
> need a built-in sequencing operator (special form). While it's not 
> strictly needed, it's much more convenient than having to write 'y when 
> _ = x end' all the time.

This is now implemented as well. ($$ operator)

I'm basically through with my 0.5 TODO list now (Windows port 
notwithstanding; I can hopefully take a look at that later today). So if 
anyone is still listening, it would be nice if you could take the latest 
svn for a test drive. ;-)

I also vaguely recall that someone volunteered to write a little test 
module for math.pure, or did I just dream that up? :)

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag