Re: [pure-lang-users] Proposed syntax changes

[John C. <co...@cc...>]

Libor Spacek scripsit:

> I am not entirely convinced that the tuples are even worth having at all. 
> For the minimal (flatness) distinction, they ship in a lot of confusion. 
> Imho it is seldom a good idea having two conflicting mechanisms for doing 
> two almost identical things.

+1.  In Q they are fixed-length vectors and seem worth having.  In Pure
they seem like a kind of substitute for multiple-valued functions.


-- 
I could dance with you till the cows            John Cowan
come home.  On second thought, I'd              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
rather dance with the cows when you             co...@cc...
come home.  --Rufus T. Firefly