Re: [pure-lang-users] Numeric Arguments

[John C. <co...@cc...>]

Albert Graef scripsit:

> > The problem is that floating-point underflow gives 0 silently, so a result
> > can become real when mathematically it should not.
> 
> That's true, but the same kind of argument could also be used to argue 
> that 3.0 should not be considered "integer" either.

Touché.

-- 
All Gaul is divided into three parts: the part          John Cowan
that cooks with lard and goose fat, the part            http://ccil.org/~cowan
that cooks with olive oil, and the part that            co...@cc...
cooks with butter. --David Chessler