Re: [pure-lang-users] llvm 2.3 - good news

[Jiri S. <jir...@bl...>]

Albert Graef napsal(a):
> Right, the new code is faster for JIT compilation, but slower on 
> execution for small list values. I worked around that now by adding a 
> minimum bound for the size of lists/tuples to which the new list 
> generation code is applied. Please check whether it's ok for you now.
> 
The speed is back as it used to be before the fixes.

> Using #set(1..1000000) as a test example, over here r462 still seems to 
> be a tad slower than r436, but that's probably due to some other, 
> unrelated fixes I did to the environment-handling code, which also incur 
> some (small) runtime cost; I'll have another look at that tomorrow.
I do not see any measurable slowdown now.

Thanks,

Jiri