Re: [pure-lang-users] llvm 2.3 - good news

[Jiri S. <jir...@bl...>]

Albert Graef wrote:
>> The code compiles much faster now. However, your latest changes made the 
>> execution memory eager and my favourite test 'set (1..1000000)' caused 
>> my PC swap to death. It seems the code isn't tail recursive anymore.
> 
> Fixed (r459).
> 
Thanks, but I am still not happy. The memory consumption is OK now, but 
my 1 M set example runs two times slower than before :-( .

Regards,

Jiri