Re: [pure-lang-users] dyld: Library not loaded: libpure-0.4.dylib

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> But does setting DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH still work even if the library path
>> is hardcoded into the binary?
> 
> Yes, it does. Many ports employ this technique to get the tests to  
> work without installation.

Right, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is used in the Makefile right now for exactly the 
same reason under Linux. I should be able to patch this up as well so 
that DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH gets used on OSX instead. Is DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=. 
sufficient for that purpose, or does DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH require an 
absolute path?

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag