Re: [pure-lang-users] dyld: Library not loaded: libpure-0.4.dylib

[Ryan S. <rya...@us...>]

On Aug 2, 2008, at 02:21, Albert Graef wrote:

> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> This does break make check, but we're used to working around that by
>> setting DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH during the check so that's fine.
>
> But does setting DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH still work even if the library path
> is hardcoded into the binary?

Yes, it does. Many ports employ this technique to get the tests to  
work without installation.