From: Libor S. <li...@gm...> - 2008-07-11 21:53:50
|
Hmmm, that is unlucky. I did much the same and it worked. The only differences being that I got the source tarball from the LLVM site, rather than the svn version, and I put in all those other recommended flags after the LLVM ./configure. And I configured pure with enable-release because I always hope that it will run faster but it did not really. L. On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:30:15 +0100, Eddie Rucker <er...@bm...> wrote: > Same old error. I uninstalled llvm and manually killed everything I > could find with llvm in my system. I went and got the svn version of > llvm-2.3, applied the patch and recompiled. Did the same with pure and > did the 'sudo /sbin/ldconfig' after install. No luck :-( > > e.r. > > On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 23:07 +0200, Jiri Spitz wrote: >> Eddie Rucker wrote: >> > I did the patch on llvm-2.3 before I configured llvm-2.3. >> > >> > I did a 'make uninstall', then 'make distclean', 'sudo /sbin/ldconfig', >> > './configure --enable-pic', 'make', 'sudo make install', 'pure', and >> > then I get >> > >> > $ pure >> > pure: error while loading shared libraries: libpure-0.5.so: cannot >> > open shared object file: No such file or directory >> > >> And 'sudo /sbin/ldconfig' after install? >> >> Jiri > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! > Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, > along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness > and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 > _______________________________________________ > pure-lang-users mailing list > pur...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pure-lang-users > |