Re: [pure-lang-users] Yet another quirk with MinGW

[John C. <co...@cc...>]

Albert Graef scripsit:

> John Cowan wrote:
> > If "round" is defined only as a macro, the implementation is out of
> > compliance.
> 
> In contrast to Cygwin, Mingw uses the native Windows libraries which at
> best pay lip service to POSIX. 

Sorry, I lost track of the context and didn't realize we were talking
MinGW here.  There's certainly no reason to expect either SUS3 or
C99 there!

-- 
John Cowan    co...@cc...    http://ccil.org/~cowan
The present impossibility of giving a scientific explanation is no proof
that there is no scientific explanation. The unexplained is not to be
identified with the unexplainable, and the strange and extraordinary
nature of a fact is not a justification for attributing it to powers
above nature.  --The Catholic Encyclopedia, s.v. "telepathy" (1913)