Re: [pure-lang-users] llvm 2.3 - good news

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Jiri Spitz wrote:
> I tried to compile Pure with llvm 2.3 under MinGW - without any 
> problems. I only used the replacements from the Rooslan's patch and add 
> another one.

Can you please post your additional change?

> And first of all - the test #15 runs 12 s instead of original 55 s (both 
> under MinGW, of course).

That's good news indeed. :) So I guess it's time to switch to LLVM 2.3
now. I can commit the necessary changes tomorrow. Everybody ready to
take the plunge?

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag