Re: [pure-lang-users] Numeric Arguments

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Eddie Rucker wrote:
>  exactp n = not (doublep n || doublep (re n) || doublep (im n));

Yes, that looks like it could work, and it's better than my definition
in math.pure. There's a guard if numberp n missing in your version, though.

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag