Re: [pure-lang-users] Numeric Arguments

[Eddie R. <er...@bm...>]

On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 23:50 +0100, Libor Spacek wrote:
> Eddie, you are right that C's fmod is different.
> What I was after was just "double mod int" which seems pretty innocuous
> to me. I have defined it myself and it saved me lots of lines of repetitious
> might also benefit from its addition.

Ok. In this case it seems logical to convert the int parameter to double
and use fmod to me.

e.r.