Re: [pure-lang-users] Patch to compile Pure with LLVM upstream

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Rooslan S. Khayrov wrote:
> Uh, no. (Unfortunately I don't have time to closely follow Pure
> development, but Q loveliness made me to try out its successor :-) )

Once you tried it there's no going back. ;-) No, seriously, if you give
it a whirl, let me know what you think.

> So, real compilation time for sets and dict is 3-4 secs, contrary to
> 1-1.5 for other modules.

So the new builder class isn't any faster, that's bad news. :(

Jiri, I think we might have to work around this for a while. I'll have a
look at those babies tomorrow and see how I can massage some of the
definitions so that the matching automata don't get that big.

Good night,
Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag