Re: [pure-lang-users] bug in def

[Jiri S. <jir...@bl...>]

Albert Graef wrote:
> 
> Why? If '=>' binds stronger than ',' then parens aren't needed there.
> The pretty-printer will only insert parens when they are required.
> 
:-o

 > infix 0 => ;
 > [1=>1, 2=>2, 3=>3];
<stdin>:2.8-9: syntax error, unexpected infix 0 operator
 > [(1=>1), (2=>2), (3=>3)];
[1=>1,2=>2,3=>3]
 >

I'd say the interpreter is a bit inconsistent here.

Jiri