Re: [pure-lang-users] bug in def

[Eddie R. <er...@bm...>]

On Sat 05/07/08  8:16 PM , Eddie Rucker er...@bm... sent:
> 
> 
> On Sat 05/07/08  8:31 PM , Albert Graef Dr.Graef
> @t-online.de sent:> Eddie Rucker wrote:
> > > I had something like
> > >  infix 2 => ;
> > 
> > Well, you want it to bind weaker than even tuples, and
> to be> non-associative, which pretty much fixes it at infix 0,
> as I originally> suggested.
> 
> With that precedence, how can I write something like [1=>"a",2=>"b"]
> without a syntax error?
> e.r.
> 

To be more specific:
 > infix 0 => ;
 > [1 => "a", 2 => "b"];
 <stdin>:2.10-12: syntax error, unexpected infix 0 operator.


e.r.