Re: [pure-lang-users] bug in def

[Eddie R. <er...@bm...>]

On Sat 05/07/08  8:31 PM , Albert Graef Dr....@t-... sent:
> Eddie Rucker wrote:
> > I had something like
> >  infix 2 => ;
> 
> Well, you want it to bind weaker than even tuples, and to be
> non-associative, which pretty much fixes it at infix 0, as I originally
> suggested.

With that precedence, how can I write something like [1=>"a",2=>"b"] without a syntax error?

e.r.