Re: [pure-lang-users] bug in def

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Eddie Rucker wrote:
> I had something like
>  infix 2 => ;

Well, you want it to bind weaker than even tuples, and to be
non-associative, which pretty much fixes it at infix 0, as I originally
suggested.

> I never gave it a real definition

You *must* not define it, it's a constructor. :)

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag