Re: [pure-lang-users] Pure on Mac OS X

[Albert G. <Dr....@t-...>]

Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I tried compiling trunk at revision 10. With Mac OS X 10.4's flex  
> 2.5.4 and bison 1.28, if I do "make all" I get:

Yes, those versions are ancient. But with the release tarball that's not
a problem because parser.cc and lexer.cc are included there and so bison
and flex aren't normally needed on the build system.

> And if I do "make depend all" I get:

You shouldn't have to do that any more, I've fixed the dependencies in
the distributed Makefile.

> Should I be running "make depend all" or "make all"?

Just "make" or "make all". That will create a debug-enabled build which
is comparatively slow, so for the release build I recommend "make
build=release".

> g++ -g -Wall `llvm-config --cppflags`   -c -o runtime.o runtime.cc
> runtime.cc: In function 'void pure_sys_vars()':
> runtime.cc:1401: error: 'GLOB_PERIOD' was not declared in this scope
> runtime.cc:1405: error: 'GLOB_ONLYDIR' was not declared in this scope
> make: *** [runtime.o] Error 1

The glob on OSX doesn't have these, apparently. Should be fixed in
revision 13.

> We have newer versions of gcc in MacPorts that I can make the pure  
> portfile use if that becomes necessary.

No, that shouldn't be necessary. Once I fixed all the OSX
incompatibilities, it should compile at least with gcc 4.0.1. Not sure
about gcc 3.x, though.

> Except that your Makefile  
> calls g++ by name, but that's not what MacPorts calls it. For example  
> MacPorts installs g++ from gcc 4.3 as "g++-mp-4.3". It also sets the  
> CC, CXX and CPP environment variables to match, so maybe the Makefile  
> should use the CXX variable if set.

You're right. Fixed in revision 15.

Thanks,
Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu...
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag