This patch could show three cyclone objects in action, an then fix three parts of the cyclone documentation bug, but it is not complete, some value and objects are not fully explained, so should I post it puredata.info and leave documentation issues, or keep the topic open until the patch is complete?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
i would split this issue into 2 parts:
- the fix of the "cyclone documentation bug", which should stay here
- a patch showing "three cyclone objects in action", which should move to puredata.info
it is a bit unfortunate, that this section is called "patches", as it really has nothing to do with "pd-patches" (aka "patchers", or .pd-files);
should your patch be assigned to krzysztof to include it in cyclone?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
crossfade patch with cyclone objects
Logged In: YES
user_id=564396
Originator: NO
is this meant to be added to cyclone~ (as a bugfix for missing documentation) or is it just a useful "patch" (as in "patcher" rather than "fix")?
in the latter case, i would suggest moving the patch to a sharing platform like http://puredata.info
Logged In: NO
This patch could show three cyclone objects in action, an then fix three parts of the cyclone documentation bug, but it is not complete, some value and objects are not fully explained, so should I post it puredata.info and leave documentation issues, or keep the topic open until the patch is complete?
Logged In: YES
user_id=564396
Originator: NO
i would split this issue into 2 parts:
- the fix of the "cyclone documentation bug", which should stay here
- a patch showing "three cyclone objects in action", which should move to puredata.info
it is a bit unfortunate, that this section is called "patches", as it really has nothing to do with "pd-patches" (aka "patchers", or .pd-files);
should your patch be assigned to krzysztof to include it in cyclone?