pt-framework-general — General mailing-list

Re: [Pt-framework-general] Framework portability

[Marc D. <mar...@gm...>]

Hello,

Pt can be compiled for Android, but it is a bit tricky at the moment.
We plan to improve Android support early 2016.

Do you need clang for OS-X or Android?

regards,
Marc


On 30 December 2015 at 02:38, Apivan Tuntakurn
<api...@or...> wrote:
> Dear Sirs
>
> We are interested in this Pt framework.
> But, we have some concerns about the framework portability.
>
> Could you please give us the information on the following questions
>
> - Does the framework available on Android's official C++ compiler?
> - Can the framework be compiled with Clang?
> - If not, is there a future plan for supporting above compiler? Please give
> us an approximate date.
>
> Thank you in advance
>
> Yours Faithfully
> Apivan Tuntakurn
>
> Software Developer C++
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pt-framework-general mailing list
> Pt-...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pt-framework-general
>

[Pt-framework-general] Framework portability

[Apivan T. <api...@or...>]

 Dear Sirs

We are interested in this Pt framework.
But, we have some concerns about the framework portability.

Could you please give us the information on the following questions

- Does the framework available on Android's official C++ compiler?
- Can the framework be compiled with Clang?
- If not, is there a future plan for supporting above compiler? Please give
us an approximate date.

Thank you in advance

Yours Faithfully
Apivan Tuntakurn

Software Developer C++

Re: [Pt-framework-general] Is that project alive?

[Marc D. <mar...@gm...>]

Hi,

have a look at http://www.pt-framework.org/docs.html. It contains code
examples and a tutorial how to do cross platform builds with jam.

regards,
Marc


On 15 February 2015 at 19:37, Сергей Царёв <sc-...@ra...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm sorry I draw yuor attention away. Just have a queation.
> Will you add some complete "ready-to-build" examples to framework's documentation.
>
> Sincerely Sergey Tsarev.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Pt-framework-general mailing list
> Pt-...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pt-framework-general

Re: [Pt-framework-general] Is that project alive?

[Сергей Ц. <sc-...@ra...>]

Hello,
I'm sorry I draw yuor attention away. Just have a queation.
Will you add some complete "ready-to-build" examples to framework's documentation.

Sincerely Sergey Tsarev.

Re: [Pt-framework-general] Is that project alive?

[Marc D. <mar...@gm...>]

Hi,

Yes, the project is very much alive, its just that noone uses this
mailing list. Anything in particular I can help you with?

best regards,
Marc


On 9 February 2015 at 18:16, Сергей Царёв <sc-...@ra...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I found the project's last mail in general branch was in 2013.
> It the project still alive? In develop?
> Sincerely Sergey Tsarev.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Pt-framework-general mailing list
> Pt-...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pt-framework-general

Re: [Pt-framework-general] Is that project alive?

[Aloysius I. <blu...@ya...>]

Hello,
If you see http://sourceforge.net/p/pt-framework/svn/HEAD/treeyou will find that the SVN last commit is about 3 days ago, so yes it is alive :D
Best regards,Aloysius

 

     On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 12:16 AM, Сергей Царёв <sc-...@ra...> wrote:
   

 
Hello,
I found the project's last mail in general branch was in 2013.
It the project still alive? In develop?
Sincerely Sergey Tsarev.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Pt-framework-general mailing list
Pt-...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pt-framework-general


   

[Pt-framework-general] Is that project alive?

[Сергей Ц. <sc-...@ra...>]

Hello,
I found the project's last mail in general branch was in 2013.
It the project still alive? In develop?
Sincerely Sergey Tsarev.

Re: [Pt-framework-general] Serialization/Deserialization, DB, and HTTP minimum working examples / Tutorials in general / Relation to TNT cxxtools/tntdb

[R. C. T. <cz...@tp...>]

Thank you very much for your kind offer!
The project is still at an early conceptual stage, but I'm drawing up
some prototype classes to implement the basic scenarios (like
synchronization of collections of business objects over the network,
etc) and get back to you then.
Perhaps those scenarios are in a generalized form itself interesting as
examples - if possible, I'd like to contribute.
Kind Regards and thanks again,
Chris

On 05/08/2013 04:23 PM, Marc Dürner wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> 
>     I'm also considering using cxx/tntnet/tntdb/s11n for the project, but
>     did not yet get cxxtools, and, subsequently tntnet/tntdb to compile
>     under msys/mingw which I understand should not be a problem with
>     Platinum.
> 
> 
> You can compile with mingw, but since mingw is still 'beta' I recommend
> to try the free visual c++ compiler from Microsoft.
>  
> 
>     Any help to getting started, any hints, are greatly appreciated!
> 
> 
> I am planning to write more tutorials soon. I can write the ones you
> need first.  The mailinglist is probably not the place to discuss your
> program in detail, so feel free to contact me using my private email
> address.
> 
> best regards,
> Marc

Re: [Pt-framework-general] Serialization/Deserialization, DB, and HTTP minimum working examples / Tutorials in general / Relation to TNT cxxtools/tntdb

[Marc D. <mar...@gm...>]

Hi,


> I'm also considering using cxx/tntnet/tntdb/s11n for the project, but
> did not yet get cxxtools, and, subsequently tntnet/tntdb to compile
> under msys/mingw which I understand should not be a problem with Platinum.
>

You can compile with mingw, but since mingw is still 'beta' I recommend to
try the free visual c++ compiler from Microsoft.


Any help to getting started, any hints, are greatly appreciated!
>

I am planning to write more tutorials soon. I can write the ones you need
first.  The mailinglist is probably not the place to discuss your program
in detail, so feel free to contact me using my private email address.

best regards,
Marc

[Pt-framework-general] Serialization/Deserialization, DB, and HTTP minimum working examples / Tutorials in general / Relation to TNT cxxtools/tntdb

[R. C. T. <cz...@tp...>]

Hello,

Platinum looks like it could provide all the functionality I need for a
project, namely a HTTP server that sends and processes RPC (formatting
does not really matter, binary would be fine) requests, serves HTML
pages and stores/retrieves its data from a Postgres or SQLite database
or serialized C++ object collections stored in binary files. However I'm
having a hard time getting started.
For XML-RPC, there is a nice beginner's tutorial, but for
serialization/deserialization all I could find is the class
documentation which is not all that helpful if you don't know already
what components you need to do what, same goes for the HTTP server and
DB layer.
I've tried to get some idea by looking at the tests bundled with the
source, but didn't really get too far.
As for the database and http/rpc parts, TNT cxxtools and TNTdb have nice
examples and I wonder about the "compatibility" of the respective
classes. I also understand that cxxtools provides serialization classes
similar to Platinum, but I didn't find any examples for these either.
I'm also considering using cxx/tntnet/tntdb/s11n for the project, but
did not yet get cxxtools, and, subsequently tntnet/tntdb to compile
under msys/mingw which I understand should not be a problem with Platinum.

Any help to getting started, any hints, are greatly appreciated!
Thank you very much in advance and kind regards,
Chris

[Pt-framework-general] Survey for framework and library developers & users: "Information needs across software ecosystems"

[Nicole H. <nic...@gm...>]

Hi,

I’m Nicole Haenni and I'm doing research for my thesis at the University of
Berne (scg.unibe.ch) with Mircea Lungu and Niko Schwarz. We are researching
on monitoring the activity in software ecosystems. This is a study about
information needs that arise in such software ecosystems. I need your help
to fill out the survey below. It takes about 10 minutes to complete it.

A software ecosystem can be a project repository like GitHub, an open
source community (e.g. the Apache community) or a language-based community
(e.g. Smalltalk has Squeaksource, Ruby has Rubyforge).

We formulate our research question as follows:
"What information needs arise when developers use code from other projects,
or see their own code used elsewhere."

Survey link: http://bit.ly/14Zc71N
or original link:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFBJUmVodVU1V3BMMGRPRWxBdjdDbVE6MA

Thank you for your support!

Nicole Haenni

-----------------------------------------

Software Composition Group
Institut für Informatik
Universität Bern
Neubrückstrasse 10
CH-3012 Bern
SWITZERLAND

Re: [Pt-framework-general] pt-cma

[Marc D. <mar...@go...>]

Hi Florin,

We have just updated the jam build system in trunk a short while ago,
and I am still working on the docs and the website updates. You can
build the debug version this way:

jam configure --debug

NOTE: debug and optimization are controlled by command line args now,
so you can set them independently. With --debug, you enable a debug
build. With --optimize you enable an optimized build. The advantage is
that you can set both independently.

NOTE: Some other good news is that your toolset should be detected,
even when you use a regular cmd.exe.You only need to set it if you
have multiple versions ov visual studio installed.

The Pt-Cma is usable, but not yet finished. We are missing some good
use-cases to really make this work. It is meant to be a lightweight
component model similar to COM, but with a better C++ API. The code is
not very large and easily to understand, so if you are interested in
the development of such a component model you are welcome to jump in
:-)

best regards,
Marc

On 18 March 2012 23:19, Florin Lozneanu <flo...@ya...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is the Pt-Cma module usable ? And if it is then is there any tutorial /
> sample that show off this module ?
>
> Another issue: I tried to build the Platinum Framework using VC9 as follow:
> 1. jam configure -sTOOLSET=vc9 -sCONFIG=debug
> 2. jam -sTOOLSET=vc9 -sCONFIG=debug
>
> All went well but the built DLLs were not suitable for debugging (looking in
> the manifest files I noticed that the expected C-runtime is
>  Microsoft.VC90.CRT).
>
> Thanks,
> Florin

[Pt-framework-general] pt-cma

[Florin L. <flo...@ya...>]

Hi,

Is the Pt-Cma module usable ? And if it is then is there any tutorial / sample that show off this module ?

Another issue: I tried to build the Platinum Framework using VC9 as follow:
1. jam configure -sTOOLSET=vc9 -sCONFIG=debug
2. jam -sTOOLSET=vc9 -sCONFIG=debug

All went well but the built DLLs were not suitable for debugging (looking in the manifest files I noticed that the expected C-runtime is  Microsoft.VC90.CRT).

Thanks,
Florin

Re: [Pt-framework-general] Begginer

[Gustávo S. <gus...@gm...>]

Fellows,

My mistake, I wrote ld, but is dl.

The error says:
ERROR: dl is required.

I cant find what it is. What is that?
PLease,
Gus

Em 17 de fevereiro de 2012 21:07, Aloysius Indrayanto <
alo...@gm...> escreveu:

> Hello,
>
> Yes we are alive and active :) Even though we have not made any new
> release and documentation, the SVN is active.
>
> Thank you for your interest to the project. I think you can start by
> getting a copy of the SVN tree and start building it.
>
> Best regards,
> Aloysius
>
>
> 2012/2/17 Gustávo Sooeiro <gus...@gm...>:
> > Hello fellows,
> >
> > I have just found the PT website and would like to know if the community
> is
> > still active.
> > It seems that there are no news lately.
> > I would like to access some tutorial or manual to begin.
> >
> > Thanks a lot!
> > Best,
> > --
> > Gustavo
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pt-framework-general mailing list
> > Pt-...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pt-framework-general
> >
>



-- 
Gustavo

Re: [Pt-framework-general] Begginer

[Aloysius I. <alo...@gm...>]

Hello,

Yes we are alive and active :) Even though we have not made any new
release and documentation, the SVN is active.

Thank you for your interest to the project. I think you can start by
getting a copy of the SVN tree and start building it.

Best regards,
Aloysius


2012/2/17 Gustávo Sooeiro <gus...@gm...>:
> Hello fellows,
>
> I have just found the PT website and would like to know if the community is
> still active.
> It seems that there are no news lately.
> I would like to access some tutorial or manual to begin.
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Best,
> --
> Gustavo
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> _______________________________________________
> Pt-framework-general mailing list
> Pt-...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pt-framework-general
>

[Pt-framework-general] Begginer

[Gustávo S. <gus...@gm...>]

Hello fellows,

I have just found the PT website and would like to know if the community is
still active.
It seems that there are no news lately.
I would like to access some tutorial or manual to begin.

Thanks a lot!
Best,
-- 
Gustavo

Re: [Pt-framework-general] TNT->PT

[Gerry W. <ge...@co...>]

Hi Marc,


That's great news! I am most definitely looking forward to that. I've got a project coming up in a couple of months that I'm hoping to use Pt on. I'll keep an eye on the Pt. When the SSL code is available, I will start working with it. Perhaps I can provide some testing/feedback ;-)


Thanks,
Gerry

Gerry Weaver
(800) 318-6118
  _____  

From: Marc Dürner [mailto:mar...@go...]
To: Gerry Weaver [mailto:ge...@co...]
Cc: pt-...@li...
Sent: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 03:20:09 -0500
Subject: Re: [Pt-framework-general] TNT->PT

Hi Gerry,
  
  Yes we do want to add SSL/TLS support via openssl soon. Aloysius has written a
  prototype implementation of Pt-Ssl with full support for iostream,
  streambuffers and
  non-blocking/async I/O :-) I reviewed it for him while he was
  developing it and he did
  a great job! The status is that all hard design problems are solved,
  but the API needs
  a bit more polishing.
  
  best regards,
  Marc
  
  On 20 August 2011 23:41, Gerry Weaver <ge...@co...> wrote:
  > Hi Marc,
  > Thanks for the reply. I appreciate all of the good work on these projects.
  > Do you plan to add SSL/TLS support to Pt in the future?
  > Thanks,
  > -G
  >
  > ________________________________
  > From: Marc Dürner [mailto:mar...@go...]
  > To: Gerry Weaver [mailto:ge...@co...]
  > Cc: pt-...@li...
  > Sent: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 05:07:31 -0500
  > Subject: Re: [Pt-framework-general] TNT->PT
  >
  > Hi Gerry,
  >
  > There is no concrete Roadmap to do that, though in the past we have shared
  > a lot of code between the two projects, so it is very possible to have a
  > tntnet
  > some day that builds on Pt. I would love to see this happen, but in the end
  > it
  > is the descision of the tntnet developers.
  >
  > regards,
  > Marc
  >
  > On 20 August 2011 01:20, Gerry Weaver <ge...@co...> wrote:
  >> Hello All,
  >> I was wondering if there is a plan to add the tnt (c++ server pages) to pt
  >> at some point.
  >> Thanks,
  >> -G
  >
    

Re: [Pt-framework-general] TNT->PT

[Marc D. <mar...@go...>]

Hi Gerry,

Yes we do want to add SSL/TLS support via openssl soon. Aloysius has written a
prototype implementation of Pt-Ssl with full support for iostream,
streambuffers and
non-blocking/async I/O :-) I reviewed it for him while he was
developing it and he did
a great job! The status is that all hard design problems are solved,
but the API needs
a bit more polishing.

best regards,
Marc

On 20 August 2011 23:41, Gerry Weaver <ge...@co...> wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> Thanks for the reply. I appreciate all of the good work on these projects.
> Do you plan to add SSL/TLS support to Pt in the future?
> Thanks,
> -G
>
> ________________________________
> From: Marc Dürner [mailto:mar...@go...]
> To: Gerry Weaver [mailto:ge...@co...]
> Cc: pt-...@li...
> Sent: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 05:07:31 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Pt-framework-general] TNT->PT
>
> Hi Gerry,
>
> There is no concrete Roadmap to do that, though in the past we have shared
> a lot of code between the two projects, so it is very possible to have a
> tntnet
> some day that builds on Pt. I would love to see this happen, but in the end
> it
> is the descision of the tntnet developers.
>
> regards,
> Marc
>
> On 20 August 2011 01:20, Gerry Weaver <ge...@co...> wrote:
>> Hello All,
>> I was wondering if there is a plan to add the tnt (c++ server pages) to pt
>> at some point.
>> Thanks,
>> -G
>

Re: [Pt-framework-general] TNT->PT

[Gerry W. <ge...@co...>]

Hi Marc,


Thanks for the reply. I appreciate all of the good work on these projects. Do you plan to add SSL/TLS support to Pt in the future?


Thanks,
-G
  _____  

From: Marc Dürner [mailto:mar...@go...]
To: Gerry Weaver [mailto:ge...@co...]
Cc: pt-...@li...
Sent: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 05:07:31 -0500
Subject: Re: [Pt-framework-general] TNT->PT

Hi Gerry,
  
  There is no concrete Roadmap to do that, though in the past we have shared
  a lot of code between the two projects, so it is very possible to have a tntnet
  some day that builds on Pt. I would love to see this happen, but in the end it
  is the descision of the tntnet developers.
  
  regards,
  Marc
  
  On 20 August 2011 01:20, Gerry Weaver <ge...@co...> wrote:
  > Hello All,
  > I was wondering if there is a plan to add the tnt (c++ server pages) to pt
  > at some point.
  > Thanks,
  > -G
    

Re: [Pt-framework-general] TNT->PT

[Marc D. <mar...@go...>]

Hi Gerry,

There is no concrete Roadmap to do that, though in the past we have shared
a lot of code between the two projects, so it is very possible to have a tntnet
some day that builds on Pt. I would love to see this happen, but in the end it
is the descision of the tntnet developers.

regards,
Marc

On 20 August 2011 01:20, Gerry Weaver <ge...@co...> wrote:
> Hello All,
> I was wondering if there is a plan to add the tnt (c++ server pages) to pt
> at some point.
> Thanks,
> -G

[Pt-framework-general] TNT->PT

[Gerry W. <ge...@co...>]

Hello All,


I was wondering if there is a plan to add the tnt (c++ server pages) to pt at some point. 


Thanks,
-G

Re: [Pt-framework-general] Unit Test

[Marc D. <mar...@go...>]

Hi Neto,

1) TestMain.h provides a mainloop. You don't have to use it, if you
want to have your own main().

Here is an example of a minimal main():

int main()
{
    Pt::Unit::Application app;
    std::ofstream fs("log.txt");
    Pt::Unit::Reporter reporter(fs);
    app.setReporter(reporter);
    return app.run();
}


2) Implement a Unit::TestSuite and register at least one method.
Register the test with a RegisterTest object.

class MyTestSuite : public Pt::Unit::TestSuite
{
    public:
        MyTestSuite ()
        : Pt::Unit::TestSuite("MyTestSuite ")
        {
            this->registerMethod( "Test1", *this, &MyTestSuite ::Test1);
        }

        void setUp()
        {  }

        void tearDown()
        {   }

        void Test1()
        {    }
};

Pt::Unit::RegisterTest<MyTestSuite > register_MyTestSuite;

3) link against Pt-Unit

regards,
Marc


On 6 February 2011 10:00, Aloysius Indrayanto
<alo...@gm...> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't think so. I think #include it will be enough.
>
> Try to refer to existing test such as the one inside the directory
> "Pt-Net/tests".
>
> Best regards,
> Aloysius
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Neto <cro...@gm...> wrote:
>>  For use the Unit test of the Platinum Framework i have to edit the
>> TestMain.h ?
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
>> and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's
>> connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
>> rules translate into the virtual world?
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pt-framework-general mailing list
>> Pt-...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pt-framework-general
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
> and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's
> connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
> rules translate into the virtual world?
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
> _______________________________________________
> Pt-framework-general mailing list
> Pt-...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pt-framework-general
>

Re: [Pt-framework-general] Unit Test

[Aloysius I. <alo...@gm...>]

Hello,

I don't think so. I think #include it will be enough.

Try to refer to existing test such as the one inside the directory
"Pt-Net/tests".

Best regards,
Aloysius


On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Neto <cro...@gm...> wrote:
>  For use the Unit test of the Platinum Framework i have to edit the
> TestMain.h ?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
> and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's
> connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
> rules translate into the virtual world?
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
> _______________________________________________
> Pt-framework-general mailing list
> Pt-...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pt-framework-general
>

[Pt-framework-general] Unit Test

[Neto <cro...@gm...>]

  For use the Unit test of the Platinum Framework i have to edit the 
TestMain.h ?

Re: [Pt-framework-general] Pt::System::Url

[Stephan B. <st...@s1...>]

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Marc Dürner <mar...@go...>wrote:

> Thanks, that is very cool ! The current Url class is something we
> inherited and really is
> very unsatisfying.
>

Might it be possible to replace the current impl entirely, possibly changing
the API of the new one a bit for backwards compatibility?


> The concept of Uri's is very general and could even describe resources
> that have nothing
> to do with system resources like files or memory.
>

FWIW: i fought with this same question in libs11n and decided that URLs are
not network-specific (i.e. does not belong in the "net" package). Though the
idea of URL originated with a network, a "uniform resource locator" could
also refer to books in a library.

-- 
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/