We've still not settled on how to define an enzyme, but there's been
some further comments on the google issue list.
http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=30
The proposals have been fleshed out a little and the current choices are:
#6
#7 - Simon Expanded example after comments is #14
#2 - Pierre-Alain My description of perl regex at #9
#15 - David
I believe that we can discount #6 as not providing sufficient
flexibility, which leaves the 3 different proposals from Simon,
Pierre-Alain and me. Any further questions/comments, please add to the
issue in google or reply to the list because we want to decide which one
to go for at the tele conference on Thursday. (If you don't intend to be
at the telecon, but want to express an opinion, please let me know by
email in advance of the telecon).
I'm still very undecided as to which is best, as all have their merits.
Thanks,
David
David Creasy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've added some comments/suggestions for specifying an enzyme to:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=30
>
> If anything needs clarification, please add further comments to the
> issue. Otherwise, we'll probably need to have a vote at the next telecon
> on whether to use
> #6, #7, #9 or #10
>
> (or yet another suggestion)
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
--
David Creasy
Matrix Science
64 Baker Street
London W1U 7GB, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7486 1050
Fax: +44 (0)20 7224 1344
dc...@ma...
http://www.matrixscience.com
Matrix Science Ltd. is registered in England and Wales
Company number 3533898
|
