You can subscribe to this list here.
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(40) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(99) |
Dec
(83) |
2009 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(88) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(5) |
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(26) |
2011 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(38) |
Mar
(50) |
Apr
(128) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(116) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(163) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(9) |
2012 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(70) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(40) |
Nov
(276) |
Dec
(34) |
2013 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(23) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(31) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(18) |
2014 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(38) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(5) |
2015 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(139) |
May
(120) |
Jun
(90) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(2) |
2017 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(4) |
2018 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(3) |
2019 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(1) |
2020 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-18 10:38:45
|
Comment #4 on issue 49 by andrewrobertjones: Issues / schema updates prior to version 1 release http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=49 The Peptide element still has an optional attribute calculatedPI but we have no examples of its use. I think this should go - Peptides have no connection with a particular software package so these values are fairly meaningless. Does anyone remember a use case for this being present? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-18 10:29:47
|
Comment #3 on issue 49 by andrewrobertjones: Issues / schema updates prior to version 1 release http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=49 I think the passThreshold part of the schema is still a bit ambiguous (a comment about FDR thresholds was also made by a reviewer). I suggest we add an optional schema element to SpectrumIdentificationProtocol and ProteinDetectionProtocol specifically for this purpose: <SpectrumIdentificationProtocol id="SIP" AnalysisSoftware_ref="AS_mascot_server"> <Threshold> <pf:cvParam accession="MS:1001316" name="mascot:SigThreshold" cvRef="PSI-MS" value="0.05"/> OR <pf:cvParam accession="MS:TODO" name="global FDR" cvRef="PSI-MS" value="0.05"/> and the same for protein detection. I realise there are cases where this cannot be given or it might be difficult to report which peptides passed the threshold but several example files have passThreshold set but do not specify what the threshold is. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-18 09:58:41
|
Comment #2 on issue 49 by andrewrobertjones: Issues / schema updates prior to version 1 release http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=49 There are three elements I would like to remove from the schema: AnalysisResultList, AnalysisResult, AnalysisResultItem. These were place holders so that any quant extensions would extend from the same points in the hierarchy as SpectrumIdentificationList, SpectrumIdentificationResult and SpectrumIdentificationItem (same for proteins). Now that quant is going to be developed independently, I can see no reason to keep them in? Unless anyone can see some benefits, I'll remove these from the hierarchy. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: Juan A. V. <ju...@eb...> - 2009-05-15 08:27:23
|
Hi all, Minutes from yesterday's phone conference can be found here: http://www.psidev.info/index.php?q=node/415 Cheers, Juan Antonio Juan Antonio Vizcaíno, Ph.D. EMBL European Bioinformatics Institute Proteomics Services Team, PANDA Group Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge, UK CB10 1SD Tel: +44 (0) 1223 492 686 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 494 468 Skype: javizca |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-14 16:28:35
|
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 48 by andrewrobertjones: calculatedMassToCharge and sequenceMass have the same information http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=48 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-14 12:45:12
|
Comment #3 on issue 48 by dcreasy: calculatedMassToCharge and sequenceMass have the same information http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=48 At the telecon on 2009-05-07 16:00 (http://psidev.info/index.php?q=node/412) we agreed to try removing sequenceLength, sequenceMass and MassTable_ref from the <Peptide> element. Added MassTable_ref to <SpectrumIdentificationItem> The updated Mascot N15 example shows an example of using MassTable_ref http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/source/browse/trunk/examples/Mascot_N15_example.mzid -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-14 10:06:45
|
Comment #1 on issue 49 by andrewrobertjones: Issues / schema updates prior to version 1 release http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=49 Schema update: Removed SequenceMass, sequenceLength and MassTable_ref from Peptide Added MassTable_ref to SpectrumIdentificationItem Added Keys and KeyRefs for this Some minor changes to FuGElight that shouldn't affect anything in mzIdentML -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: Darren K. <da...@pr...> - 2009-05-13 20:51:56
|
Hi all, I just wanted to introduce Rob Burke, who has recently joined the mail list and will be joining on the mzIndentML conference calls. He will be working on the ProteoWizard implementation of mzIndentML. For those of you who I haven't met via the mzML working group, we work in Parag Mallick's lab at University of Southern California. The ProteoWizard project page is here: http://proteowizard.sourceforge.net Cheers! Darren |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-13 20:16:42
|
Comment #1 on issue 50 by pierrealainbinz: Taxonomy for each protein (DBSequence) http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=50 I vote for the option with different CV terms, all with a is_a: MS:1001089 relationship. But I would prefer to see the latter be renamed molecule taxonomy, as it can be a result from a search in a nucleotide sequence database and not a protein sequence database (some tools do on-the-fly translation of nucleotide sequences) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: Matthew C. <mat...@va...> - 2009-05-13 18:47:44
|
I found some redundant names after the merge that causes problems with pwiz. id: MS:1000336 name: neutral loss def: "The loss of an uncharged species during a rearrangement process." [PSI:MS] is_a: MS:1000445 ! sequential m/z separation method ? id: MS:1001061 name: neutral loss def: "Leave this to PSI-MOD?" [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001055 ! modification parameters and id: MS:1000796 name: spectrum title def: "A free-form text title describing a spectrum." [PSI:MS] comment: This is the preferred storage place for the spectrum TITLE from an MGF peak list. This term corresponds to Protein Informatics CV term PI:00416 xref: value-type:xsd\:string "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1000499 ! spectrum attribute id: MS:1001416 name: spectrum title def: "Holds the spectrum title from different input file formats, e.g. MGF TITLE." [PSI:PI] xref: value-type:xsd\:string "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1001405 ! spectrum identification result details I'm pretty sure one of each duplicate pair should be obsoleted, which will render it more or less invisible to pwiz. Thoughts? -Matt Pierre-Alain Binz wrote: > Fine with me. > Yes, the ms-vocab list should be used for this. Request for changes > can be done on other lists, but the actual changes should be > documented there (not a perfect tracking system, but easy to search). > The CV editors must be in the list, and only those in the list are > allowed to edit. > > If the changes are quick, there is probably no need to "lock" the file > via a short announce on the vocab list. But if the work to be done is > longer (a few hours), it should be mentioned (I start, it's done) on > the list > > Does that sounds ok? > If yes, Eric can summarise the process (pragmatism is key here) > > Pierre-Alain > > Eric Deutsch wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, with the merging of the CV, we should probably review >> the versioning rules and, assuming we still like them, try to stick >> to them. >> >> According to our spec doc: >> >> A new psi-ms.obo should then be released by updating the file on the >> CVS server without changing the name of the file (this would alter >> the propagation of the file to the OBO website and to other ontology >> services that rely on file stable URI). For this reason an internal >> version number with two decimals (x.y.z) should be increased: >> >> • x should be increased when a first level term are renamed added >> deleted or rearranged in the structure. Such rearrangement is suppose >> to be rare and is very likely to have repercussion on the mapping. >> >> • y should be increased when any other term except the first level >> one is altered. >> >> • z should be increased when there is no term addition or deletion >> but just editing on the definitions or other minor changes. >> >> Are we all still on board with this? >> >> I made the new merged CV version 2.0.0. >> >> Since we have more people editing now, it is probably more important >> than ever to follow the edit protocol: >> >> - Grab the latest CV from CVS >> >> - Edit as necessary relatively quickly >> >> - Update the internal version number according to the rules above >> >> - Update the “lastID.txt” file in CVS too >> >> - Commit changes >> >> We have a psidev-ms-vocab email list which is rather disused. I >> suggest we make sure all the main editors are on it and update things >> so that the CVS commit messages go to that list to help us keep >> up-to-date. Does this seem good? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Erric >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your >> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to >> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 >> Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image >> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Psidev-ms-dev mailing list >> Psi...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev >> |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-13 18:06:24
|
Status: Accepted Owner: dcreasy Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 50 by dcreasy: Taxonomy for each protein (DBSequence) http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=50 We don't currently have an example for MS:1001089 and MS:1001090 and they are not well defined. [Term] id: MS:1001089 name: protein taxonomy def: "The taxonomy of the resultant protein from the search." [PSI:PI] xref: value-type:xsd\:string "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1001085 ! protein result details [Term] id: MS:1001090 name: taxonomy nomenclature def: "The system used to indicate taxonomy. There should be an enumerated list of options: latin name, NCBI TaxID, common name, Swiss-Prot species ID (ex. RABIT from the full protein ID ALBU_RABIT)." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001089 ! protein taxonomy This seems a little unwieldy to me. How about just having different CV for each type of ID. For example <DBSequence id="x" length="449" SearchDatabase_ref="y" accession="z" > <seq>MGKEKFHINIVVIGHVDSGKSTTTGHLIY...</seq> <pf:cvParam accession="MS:1001088" name="protein description" cvRef="PSI-MS" value="Elongation factor..." /> <pf:cvParam accession="MS:xxxxxx1" name="taxonomy: NCBI TaxID" cvRef="PSI-MS" value="9606" /> <pf:cvParam accession="MS:xxxxxx2" name="taxonomy: common name" cvRef="PSI-MS" value="human" /> <pf:cvParam accession="MS:xxxxxx3" name="taxonomy: scientific name" cvRef="PSI-MS" value="Homo sapiens" /> <pf:cvParam accession="MS:xxxxxx4" name="taxonomy: Swiss-Prot ID" cvRef="PSI-MS" value="HUMAN" /> </DBSequence> It should be possible to have 0..many taxonomy definitions for each sequence. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-13 15:24:05
|
Comment #10 on issue 31 by dcreasy: Specifying the Search Database(s) Unambiguously - MIRIAM? http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=31 Thanks for finding this out. I guess the most commonly used 'database' in the mass spec world is the NCBI 'nr' database. Be interesting to know if this is not included because of '1' or '2'. Also, how about MSIPI. http://www.pil.sdu.dk/msipi.htm Would they include this as a separate database? Please let us know what they decide about '3' Thanks, David -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: David C. <dc...@ma...> - 2009-05-13 14:40:03
|
Hi, At the recent meeting in Turku, we made three changes to those in the 'official roles' in the PSI-PI group: Jenny Siepen is having to step down from being the secretary and Juan Antonio Vizcaíno has kindly offered to take over. Zsuzanna Bencsath-Makkai has been unable to give much time to the PSI recently, so Andreas Bertsch has been coordinating much of the ontology work. Angel Pizarro has also been unable to be as actively involved as in the past, and Andy Jones has volunteered to take over as the chair of the group. Hopefully Angel will continue to have some time to provide feedback and expertise to the process. Many thanks to Angel, Jenny and Zsuzanna to all the input that they have provided in the past. And, as always we are looking for more people to be actively involved through providing comments on the specifications and joining in on the telephone conference calls. http://psidev.info/index.php?q=node/319#group_structure David -- David Creasy Matrix Science 64 Baker Street London W1U 7GB, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7486 1050 Fax: +44 (0)20 7224 1344 dc...@ma... http://www.matrixscience.com Matrix Science Ltd. is registered in England and Wales Company number 3533898 |
From: David C. <dc...@ma...> - 2009-05-13 14:11:02
|
Hi, I've updated the Mascot mzIdentML examples. I've also changed the extension to .mzid and changed the links on the page here: http://psidev.info/index.php?q=node/319#deliverablequicklinks A few errors I can't explain - they are either bugs in the mapping file or the examples: Mascot_MSMS_example.mzid: No mapping rule found for element '/mzIdentML/AnalysisProtocolCollection/SpectrumIdentificationProtocol/ModificationParams/SearchModification/SpecificityRules' Mascot_NA_example.mzid: Value of CV term not allowed: 'MS:1001423 - translation table description'... David -- David Creasy Matrix Science 64 Baker Street London W1U 7GB, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7486 1050 Fax: +44 (0)20 7224 1344 dc...@ma... http://www.matrixscience.com Matrix Science Ltd. is registered in England and Wales Company number 3533898 |
From: Jones, A. <And...@li...> - 2009-05-13 14:06:56
|
Hi everyone, There will be an mzIdentML working group conference call on Thurs 14th May at 4:00pm UK time: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=14&month=5&year=2009&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=136 Agenda: - Review minutes from last call: http://www.psidev.info/index.php?q=node/412 - Review of merged CV: http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/source/browse/trunk/cv/psi-ms.obo - Updates to the example instance docs - problems identified - Outstanding schema issues - Other outstanding items on the issues list. Please send me any further items for the agenda. Dial in details: + Germany: 08001012079 + Switzerland: 0800000860 + UK: 08081095644 + USA: 1-866-314-3683 + Generic international: +44 2083222500 (UK number) access code: 297427 cheers Andy |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-13 14:02:46
|
Comment #9 on issue 31 by javizca74: Specifying the Search Database(s) Unambiguously - MIRIAM? http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=31 Hi, This is what I found out after a meeting with the MIRIAM people today: 1. The only requirements for a database to be included in MIRIAM are: to be freely available, accessible on-line, to have stable and unique identifiers for the entries and no licence restriction for using it. 2.Apart from that, if any resource is not there yet is because noone has told them yet. They are very happy to add new ones and it should be a very straightforward process. 3.I have told them about the fact that they have at present UniProt and UniParc, for instance, but no specific entries for UniProtKB/SwissProt, TrEMBL, UniRef,...They are going to think about this. Again, noone had told them before. 4.Both the MIRIAM identifier (for instance, for PRIDE MIR:00000065) or the MIRIAM URN (urn:miriam:pride) could be used for referencing the database. 5.For IPI, they do not want to split it by different species, but as pointed out before, to add a new CV term (taxID) would be possible. I think it is out of the scope here, but MIRIAM is being used in MIAME documents to assure that the identifiers reported match the corresponding referenced database. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: Eric D. <ede...@sy...> - 2009-05-11 07:55:44
|
Yes! Please do. Thanks, Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: David Creasy [mailto:dc...@ma...] > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 11:19 AM > To: Mass spectrometry standard development; psidev-pi- > de...@li... > Subject: [Psidev-ms-dev] Referencing spectra in mzML from mzIdentML > documents > > Hi, > > Bringing up an old topic... > > In the documentation for analysisXML (now called mzIdentML) we have: > > Spectra represented in mzML (in the <Spectrum> element) have two unique > identifiers, one newly generated for mzML stored in the ID attribute, > and one using the system above derived from the source file, stored in > the nativeID attribute. If the source file is mzML, > SpectrumIdentificationResult SHOULD reference the ID in mzML since this > value has a data type of xsd:id and is thus guaranteed to be unique. > > > Should this be replaced with something like: > > Spectra represented in mzML (in the <Spectrum> element) have two unique > identifiers, one newly generated for mzML stored in the index attribute, > and one using the system above derived from the source file, stored in > the id attribute. If the source file is mzML, > SpectrumIdentificationResult SHOULD reference the id in mzML since this > value is more descriptive and is guaranteed to be unique. > > > David > > -- > David Creasy > Matrix Science > 64 Baker Street > London W1U 7GB, UK > Tel: +44 (0)20 7486 1050 > Fax: +44 (0)20 7224 1344 > > dc...@ma... > http://www.matrixscience.com > > Matrix Science Ltd. is registered in England and Wales > Company number 3533898 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your > production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to > Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK > i700 > Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image > processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com > _______________________________________________ > Psidev-ms-dev mailing list > Psi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev |
From: David C. <dc...@ma...> - 2009-05-10 18:13:58
|
Minutes available here: http://psidev.info/index.php?q=node/412 (Thanks to Juan Antonio) David Creasy wrote: > Hi everyone, > > There will be an mzIdentML working group conference call tomorrow > (Thursday) at 4:00pm UK time: > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=7&month=5&year=2009&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=136 > > > Minutes from the spring meeting in Turku at: > http://psidev.info/index.php?q=node/410 > > Agenda: > - Review of merged CV: > http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/source/browse/trunk/cv/psi-ms.obo > (NB. this is a temporary location...) > If possible, please review before the telecon. > This page describes where each term may appear: > http://www-bs2.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/services/OpenMS/analysisXML/mapping_and_cv.html > > > - Timeplan for updates to the example instance docs > - Other outstanding items on the issues list. > > Dial in details: > > + Germany: 08001012079 > + Switzerland: 0800000860 > + UK: 08081095644 > + USA: 1-866-314-3683 > + Generic international: +44 2083222500 (UK number) > > access code: 297427 > -- David Creasy Matrix Science 64 Baker Street London W1U 7GB, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7486 1050 Fax: +44 (0)20 7224 1344 dc...@ma... http://www.matrixscience.com Matrix Science Ltd. is registered in England and Wales Company number 3533898 |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-07 15:55:46
|
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #5 on issue 47 by andrewrobertjones: The name of AnalysisXML http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=47 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-07 15:00:22
|
Status: Accepted Owner: andrewrobertjones Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 49 by andrewrobertjones: Issues / schema updates prior to version 1 release http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=49 Minor schema update: Removed mzIdentML-->DatabaseReference This is no longer a valid element now that Database has been removed. (i.e. this gave the ability for a file to reference a corresponding database entry, don't think this is required) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-07 14:37:01
|
Comment #67 on issue 42 by andrewrobertjones: Issues with the CV http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=42 "Regular expression" appears under search input details. These should perhaps come under cleavage agent details and be re-named to "Cleavage agent regular expression" "spectrum identification result details" looks fairly similar to "search result details". It also has some child terms that look a bit strange: "MGF Raw Scans" "Unknown modification" appears directly beneath "spectrum interpretation" is this correct? "role type" (contact roles) appears under "spectrum interpretation" - these should probably go under contacts at the top of the CV "taxonomy nomenclature" - I don't understand the usage of this term -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-07 14:15:43
|
Comment #2 on issue 48 by andrewrobertjones: calculatedMassToCharge and sequenceMass have the same information http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=48 As far as I remember the reason why both were kept is because they fulfil slightly different roles. The Peptide element could be re-used by different SpectrumIdentificationItems (i.e. different charge states would give different values). I think this is quite a weak difference though and I wonder if we should get rid of some of the optional elements on Peptide: sequenceMass and sequenceLength, the latter seems particularly pointless. I notice that peptideSequence is optional, probably this should be mandatory? Are there any use cases where a peptideSequence could not be provided? It also appears that the sequenceMass and calculatedMassToCharge values don't tally in the Sequest example! Another good reason to get rid of one or the other... -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-06 15:20:08
|
Comment #65 on issue 42 by a.bertsch0815: Issues with the CV http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=42 - added PEFF - deleted MS:1001214 prot:global FDR changed pep:global FDR (MS:1001364) to simply global FDR, changed inheritence structure to fit into both locations -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: <cod...@go...> - 2009-05-06 15:17:03
|
Comment #66 on issue 42 by a.bertsch0815: Issues with the CV http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=42 TODOs - Compile a Software List (Mascot and Co., only included so far, greylag added. - Mapping for checksums for databases (terms contained in PSI-MS) - Database terms? Taxonomy? Mapping rules missing: /mzIdentML/DataCollection/Inputs/SourceFile/ /mzIdentML/DataCollection/AnalysisData/SpectrumIdentificationList/SpectrumIdentificationResult/SpectrumIdentificationItem/PeptideEvidence/ /mzIdentML/DataCollection/AnalysisData/ProteinDetectionList/ProteinAmbiguityGroup/ -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings |
From: David C. <dc...@ma...> - 2009-05-06 10:43:47
|
Hi everyone, There will be an mzIdentML working group conference call tomorrow (Thursday) at 4:00pm UK time: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=7&month=5&year=2009&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=136 Minutes from the spring meeting in Turku at: http://psidev.info/index.php?q=node/410 Agenda: - Review of merged CV: http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/source/browse/trunk/cv/psi-ms.obo (NB. this is a temporary location...) If possible, please review before the telecon. This page describes where each term may appear: http://www-bs2.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/services/OpenMS/analysisXML/mapping_and_cv.html - Timeplan for updates to the example instance docs - Other outstanding items on the issues list. Dial in details: + Germany: 08001012079 + Switzerland: 0800000860 + UK: 08081095644 + USA: 1-866-314-3683 + Generic international: +44 2083222500 (UK number) access code: 297427 -- David Creasy Matrix Science 64 Baker Street London W1U 7GB, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7486 1050 Fax: +44 (0)20 7224 1344 dc...@ma... http://www.matrixscience.com Matrix Science Ltd. is registered in England and Wales Company number 3533898 |