Hi Sean, I have made the follow additions to the MS CV:
[Term]
id: MS:1000931
name: AB SCIEX QTRAP 5500
def: "Applied Biosystems|MDS SCIEX QTRAP 5500." [PSI:MS]
is_a: MS:1000121 ! AB SCIEX instrument model
[Term]
id: MS:1000932
name: AB SCIEX TripleTOF 5600
def: "Applied Biosystems|MDS SCIEX TripleTOF 5500, a quadrupole - quadrupole
- time-of-flight mass spectrometer." [PSI:MS]
is_a: MS:1000121 ! AB SCIEX instrument model
Does this seem good? Please suggest changes.
While looking at the AB SCIEX tree, I noticed some additional issues.
1) We have two top-level entries:
----------------------------
[Term]
id: MS:1000495
name: Applied Biosystems instrument model
def: "Applied Biosystems instrument model." [PSI:MS]
synonym: "ABI" EXACT []
is_a: MS:1000031 ! instrument model
Has children:
- 4700 Proteomics Analyzer
- Voyager-DE PRO
- Voyager-DE STR
- 4800 Proteomics Analyzer
----------------------------
[Term]
id: MS:1000121
name: AB SCIEX instrument model
def: "The brand of instruments from the joint venture between Applied
Biosystems and MDS Analytical Technologies (formerly MDS SCIEX). Previously
branded as \"Applied Biosystems|MDS SCIEX\"." [PSI:MS]
synonym: "Applied Biosystems|MDS SCIEX" RELATED []
is_a: MS:1000031 ! instrument model
Has children:
- everything else
----------------------------
Are we still happy with this. Can you suggest a definition change to help
understand the distinction between these two?
2) We have currently the following terms (not a complete list)
[Term]
id: MS:1000140
name: 4700 Proteomics Analyzer
def: "Applied Biosystems/MDS SCIEX 4700 Proteomics Analyzer MS." [PSI:MS]
is_a: MS:1000495 ! Applied Biosystems instrument model
[Term]
id: MS:1000658
name: 4800 Proteomics Analyzer
def: "Applied Biosystems|MDS SCIEX 4800 Proteomics Analyzer." [PSI:MS]
is_a: MS:1000495 ! Applied Biosystems instrument model
[Term]
id: MS:1000139
name: 4000 Q TRAP
def: "Applied Biosystems/MDS SCIEX Q 4000 TRAP MS." [PSI:MS]
is_a: MS:1000121 ! AB SCIEX instrument model
[Term]
id: MS:1000187
name: Q TRAP
def: "Applied Biosystems/MDS SCIEX Q TRAP MS." [PSI:MS]
is_a: MS:1000121 ! AB SCIEX instrument model
[Term]
id: MS:1000870
name: 4000 QTRAP
def: "AB SCIEX or Applied Biosystems|MDS SCIEX QTRAP 4000." [PSI:MS]
is_a: MS:1000121 ! AB SCIEX instrument model
[Term]
id: MS:1000652
name: 4800 Plus MALDI TOF-TOF Analyzer
def: "AB SCIEX or Applied Biosystems|MDS SCIEX 4800 Plus MALDI TOF-TOF
Analyzer." [PSI:MS]
is_a: MS:1000121 ! AB SCIEX instrument model
[Term]
id: MS:1001482
name: AB SCIEX TOF/TOF 5800
def: "AB SCIEX or Applied Biosystems|MDS Analytical Technologies AB SCIEX
TOF/TOF 5800 Analyzer." [PSI:MS]
is_a: MS:1000121 ! AB SCIEX instrument model
------------------------------------
I have the following questions:
A) Is MS:1000658 (4800 Proteomics Analyzer) the same as MS:1000652 (4800
Plus MALDI TOF-TOF Analyzer) ?
B) We appear to have a duplicate for the 4000 Q TRAP:
MS:1000139 (4000 Q TRAP) and MS:1000870 (4000 QTRAP)
According to marketing materials, there should be a space in Q TRAP, so the
oroginal
MS:1000139 appears to be correct.
I propose obsoleting MS:1000870. Okay?
C) Is MS:1000139 (4000 Q TRAP) different from MS:1000187 (Q TRAP) ?
Thank you for helping to tidy up!
Eric
*From:* Seymour, Sean (ABSCIEX) [mailto:Sea...@ab...]
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:07 PM
*To:* psi...@li...
*Subject:* [Psidev-ms-dev] New CV needed
Hi all,
I’m not sure if it’s been done already but we need a new instrument added to
the CV: “TripleTOF 5600” (no space in TripleTOF). The vendor or brand should
be listed as “AB SCIEX”. Any more info needed than that?
Thanks!
Sean
|
