You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
2005 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(15) |
2006 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(2) |
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
|
Oct
(119) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(3) |
2008 |
Jan
(34) |
Feb
(202) |
Mar
(57) |
Apr
(76) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(33) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(41) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(84) |
Dec
(216) |
2009 |
Jan
(102) |
Feb
(126) |
Mar
(112) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(91) |
Jun
(54) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(23) |
2010 |
Jan
(29) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(7) |
2012 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(23) |
2013 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(12) |
2014 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(3) |
2015 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(13) |
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
2016 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(2) |
2017 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(4) |
2018 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(5) |
2019 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(1) |
2020 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Jones, A. <And...@li...> - 2014-05-07 11:22:08
|
Hi Gerhard, Sorry my previous email on this topic perhaps wasn't clear. I don't think we can obsolete the neutral loss terms because they are still needed for mzIdentML 1.1 - which will not be able to incorporate split terms, due to 1..1 cardinality on the relevant CvParam element. Can we roll back this change for now, until we decide how to handle this issue. Best wishes Andy -----Original Message----- From: Gerhard Mayer [mailto:may...@ru...] Sent: 07 May 2014 12:18 To: psi...@li...; psi...@li...; psi...@li... Subject: [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.64.0_rc2 of psi-ms.obo Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.64.0_rc2 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains new terms for mzTab, for specifying the neutral losses, for collision-induced dissociation and for PeptideShaker. The neutral losses are now defined as terms independently from the ions in order to decouple the two concepts ion and neutral loss from each other. The old neutral loss terms are now obsoleted. Furthermore some terms from the purgatory branch are now obsolete. In addition I corrected some spelling errors in definitions. Changed CV terms in version 3.64.0_rc2 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== ************ The following terms from the purgatory branch are now obsoleted: MS:1000329 linked scan MS:1000268 mass spectrometry MS:1000013 resolution type MS:1000020 scanning method MS:1000459 spectrum instrument description ************ The following neutral loss terms are now obsoleted: MS:1001148 a ion-H2O MS:1001146 a ion-NH3 MS:1001150 b ion-H2O MS:1002450 b ion-H3PO4 MS:1001149 b ion-NH3 MS:1001152 y ion-H2O MS:1002451 y ion-H3PO4 MS:1001151 y ion-NH3 New CV terms in version 3.64.0_rc2 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002452 name: Maui def: "The Maltcms Graphical User Interface." [PSI:PI, http://maltcms.sf.net] is_a: MS:1001456 ! analysis software is_a: MS:1001457 ! data processing software [Term] id: MS:1002453 name: No fixed modifications searched def: "No fixed modifications are included as a parameter for the search, and therefore they are not reported." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002094 ! common search engine input parameter [Term] id: MS:1002454 name: No variable modifications searched def: "No variable modifications are included as a parameter for the search, and therefore they are not reported." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002094 ! common search engine input parameter [Term] id: MS:1002455 name: H2O neutral loss def: "Neutral loss of water." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1000336 ! neutral loss [Term] id: MS:1002456 name: NH3 neutral loss def: "Neutral loss of ammonia." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1000336 ! neutral loss [Term] id: MS:1002457 name: H3PO4 neutral loss def: "Neutral loss of phosphoric acid." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1000336 ! neutral loss [Term] id: MS:1002458 name: PeptideShaker def: "PeptideShaker is a software for the interpretation of proteomics identification results." [PSI:PI, http://peptide-shaker.googlecode.com] is_a: MS:1001456 ! analysis software [Term] id: MS:1002459 name: MS Amanda csv format def: "MS Amanda csv output format." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001040 ! intermediate analysis format [Term] id: MS:1002460 name: protein group-level global FNR def: "Estimation of the global false negative rate of protein groups." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002346 ! protein group-level result details relationship: has_domain MS:1002305 ! value between 0 and 1 inclusive [Term] id: MS:1002461 name: protein group-level confidence def: "Estimation of the global confidence of protein groups." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002346 ! protein group-level result details [Term] id: MS:1002462 name: distinct peptide-level global FNR def: "Estimation of the global false negative rate for distinct peptides once redundant identifications of the same peptide have been removed (id est multiple PSMs have been collapsed to one entry)." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001105 ! peptide result details relationship: has_domain MS:1002305 ! value between 0 and 1 inclusive [Term] id: MS:1002463 name: distinct peptide-level global confidence def: "Estimation of the global confidence for distinct peptides once redundant identifications of the same peptide have been removed (id est multiple PSMs have been collapsed to one entry)." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001105 ! peptide result details [Term] id: MS:1002464 name: PSM-level global FNR def: "Estimation of the global false negative rate of peptide spectrum matches." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002345 ! PSM-level result details relationship: has_domain MS:1002305 ! value between 0 and 1 inclusive [Term] id: MS:1002465 name: PSM-level global confidence def: "Estimation of the global confidence of peptide spectrum matches." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002345 ! PSM-level result details [Term] id: MS:1002466 name: PeptideShaker PSM score def: "The probability based PeptideShaker PSM score." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score is_a: MS:1001143 ! search engine specific score for PSMs relationship: has_order MS:1002108 ! higher score better [Term] id: MS:1002467 name: PeptideShaker PSM confidence def: "The probability based PeptideShaker PSM confidence." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score is_a: MS:1001143 ! search engine specific score for PSMs relationship: has_order MS:1002108 ! higher score better [Term] id: MS:1002468 name: PeptideShaker peptide score def: "The probability based PeptideShaker peptide score." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score relationship: has_order MS:1002108 ! higher score better [Term] id: MS:1002469 name: PeptideShaker peptide confidence def: "The probability based PeptideShaker peptide confidence." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score relationship: has_order MS:1002108 ! higher score better [Term] id: MS:1002470 name: PeptideShaker protein group score def: "The probability based PeptideShaker protein group score." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score relationship: has_order MS:1002108 ! higher score better [Term] id: MS:1002471 name: PeptideShaker protein group confidence def: "The probability based PeptideShaker protein group confidence." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score relationship: has_order MS:1002108 ! higher score better [Term] id: MS:1002472 name: beam-type high-energy collision-induced dissociation def: "A beam-type collision-induced dissociation process wherein the projectile ion has the translational energy higher than approximately 1000 eV." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1000422 ! high-energy collision-induced dissociation [Term] id: MS:1002473 name: trap-type high-energy collision-induced dissociation def: "A trap-type collision-induced dissociation process wherein the projectile ion has the translational energy higher than approximately 1000 eV." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1000422 ! high-energy collision-induced dissociation [Term] id: MS:1002474 name: electron transfer dissociation followed by beam-type collision-induced dissociation def: "A process to fragment ions in a mass spectrometer by inducing fragmentation of cations by transferring electrons to them, after which the fragments are further dissociated using beam-type collisional excitation." [PSI:PI] synonym: "EThcD" EXACT [] is_a: MS:1002472 ! beam-type high-energy collision-induced dissociation Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de |
From: Gerhard M. <may...@ru...> - 2014-05-07 11:17:58
|
Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.64.0_rc2 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains new terms for mzTab, for specifying the neutral losses, for collision-induced dissociation and for PeptideShaker. The neutral losses are now defined as terms independently from the ions in order to decouple the two concepts ion and neutral loss from each other. The old neutral loss terms are now obsoleted. Furthermore some terms from the purgatory branch are now obsolete. In addition I corrected some spelling errors in definitions. Changed CV terms in version 3.64.0_rc2 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== ************ The following terms from the purgatory branch are now obsoleted: MS:1000329 linked scan MS:1000268 mass spectrometry MS:1000013 resolution type MS:1000020 scanning method MS:1000459 spectrum instrument description ************ The following neutral loss terms are now obsoleted: MS:1001148 a ion-H2O MS:1001146 a ion-NH3 MS:1001150 b ion-H2O MS:1002450 b ion-H3PO4 MS:1001149 b ion-NH3 MS:1001152 y ion-H2O MS:1002451 y ion-H3PO4 MS:1001151 y ion-NH3 New CV terms in version 3.64.0_rc2 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002452 name: Maui def: "The Maltcms Graphical User Interface." [PSI:PI, http://maltcms.sf.net] is_a: MS:1001456 ! analysis software is_a: MS:1001457 ! data processing software [Term] id: MS:1002453 name: No fixed modifications searched def: "No fixed modifications are included as a parameter for the search, and therefore they are not reported." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002094 ! common search engine input parameter [Term] id: MS:1002454 name: No variable modifications searched def: "No variable modifications are included as a parameter for the search, and therefore they are not reported." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002094 ! common search engine input parameter [Term] id: MS:1002455 name: H2O neutral loss def: "Neutral loss of water." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1000336 ! neutral loss [Term] id: MS:1002456 name: NH3 neutral loss def: "Neutral loss of ammonia." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1000336 ! neutral loss [Term] id: MS:1002457 name: H3PO4 neutral loss def: "Neutral loss of phosphoric acid." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1000336 ! neutral loss [Term] id: MS:1002458 name: PeptideShaker def: "PeptideShaker is a software for the interpretation of proteomics identification results." [PSI:PI, http://peptide-shaker.googlecode.com] is_a: MS:1001456 ! analysis software [Term] id: MS:1002459 name: MS Amanda csv format def: "MS Amanda csv output format." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001040 ! intermediate analysis format [Term] id: MS:1002460 name: protein group-level global FNR def: "Estimation of the global false negative rate of protein groups." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002346 ! protein group-level result details relationship: has_domain MS:1002305 ! value between 0 and 1 inclusive [Term] id: MS:1002461 name: protein group-level confidence def: "Estimation of the global confidence of protein groups." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002346 ! protein group-level result details [Term] id: MS:1002462 name: distinct peptide-level global FNR def: "Estimation of the global false negative rate for distinct peptides once redundant identifications of the same peptide have been removed (id est multiple PSMs have been collapsed to one entry)." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001105 ! peptide result details relationship: has_domain MS:1002305 ! value between 0 and 1 inclusive [Term] id: MS:1002463 name: distinct peptide-level global confidence def: "Estimation of the global confidence for distinct peptides once redundant identifications of the same peptide have been removed (id est multiple PSMs have been collapsed to one entry)." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001105 ! peptide result details [Term] id: MS:1002464 name: PSM-level global FNR def: "Estimation of the global false negative rate of peptide spectrum matches." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002345 ! PSM-level result details relationship: has_domain MS:1002305 ! value between 0 and 1 inclusive [Term] id: MS:1002465 name: PSM-level global confidence def: "Estimation of the global confidence of peptide spectrum matches." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002345 ! PSM-level result details [Term] id: MS:1002466 name: PeptideShaker PSM score def: "The probability based PeptideShaker PSM score." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score is_a: MS:1001143 ! search engine specific score for PSMs relationship: has_order MS:1002108 ! higher score better [Term] id: MS:1002467 name: PeptideShaker PSM confidence def: "The probability based PeptideShaker PSM confidence." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score is_a: MS:1001143 ! search engine specific score for PSMs relationship: has_order MS:1002108 ! higher score better [Term] id: MS:1002468 name: PeptideShaker peptide score def: "The probability based PeptideShaker peptide score." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score relationship: has_order MS:1002108 ! higher score better [Term] id: MS:1002469 name: PeptideShaker peptide confidence def: "The probability based PeptideShaker peptide confidence." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score relationship: has_order MS:1002108 ! higher score better [Term] id: MS:1002470 name: PeptideShaker protein group score def: "The probability based PeptideShaker protein group score." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score relationship: has_order MS:1002108 ! higher score better [Term] id: MS:1002471 name: PeptideShaker protein group confidence def: "The probability based PeptideShaker protein group confidence." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score relationship: has_order MS:1002108 ! higher score better [Term] id: MS:1002472 name: beam-type high-energy collision-induced dissociation def: "A beam-type collision-induced dissociation process wherein the projectile ion has the translational energy higher than approximately 1000 eV." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1000422 ! high-energy collision-induced dissociation [Term] id: MS:1002473 name: trap-type high-energy collision-induced dissociation def: "A trap-type collision-induced dissociation process wherein the projectile ion has the translational energy higher than approximately 1000 eV." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1000422 ! high-energy collision-induced dissociation [Term] id: MS:1002474 name: electron transfer dissociation followed by beam-type collision-induced dissociation def: "A process to fragment ions in a mass spectrometer by inducing fragmentation of cations by transferring electrons to them, after which the fragments are further dissociated using beam-type collisional excitation." [PSI:PI] synonym: "EThcD" EXACT [] is_a: MS:1002472 ! beam-type high-energy collision-induced dissociation Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de |
From: Gerhard M. <may...@ru...> - 2014-05-06 08:08:19
|
Hi Henk, Matt and Pierre-Alain, if I understood you correctly, you want to obsolete the term MS:1000422 and replace it by two beam-type and trap-type specific terms, so that we can "HCD" as RELATED synonym, whereas an own term for the EThcD method isn't needed, because you can describe that now by the combination of the two terms MS:1000598 (electron transfer dissociation) and MS:1002458 (beam-type high-energy collision-induced dissociation) Would the following be ok for you? [Term] id: MS:1000422 name: high-energy collision-induced dissociation def: "OBSOLETE A collision-induced dissociation process wherein the projectile ion has the translational energy higher than approximately 1000 eV." [PSI:MS] synonym: "HCD" EXACT [] is_a: MS:1000044 ! dissociation method comment: This term was made obsolete because it was replaced by beam-type high-energy collision-induced dissociation (MS:1002458) and trap-type high-energy collision-induced dissociation (MS:1002459). is_obsolete: true [Term] id: MS:1002458 name: beam-type high-energy collision-induced dissociation def: "A beam-type collision-induced dissociation process wherein the projectile ion has the translational energy higher than approximately 1000 eV." [PSI:MS] synonym: "HCD" RELATED [] is_a: MS:1000044 ! dissociation method [Term] id: MS:1002459 name: trap-type high-energy collision-induced dissociation def: "A trap-type collision-induced dissociation process wherein the projectile ion has the translational energy higher than approximately 1000 eV." [PSI:MS] synonym: "HCD" RELATED [] is_a: MS:1000044 ! dissociation method Regards, Gerhard Am 02.05.2014 12:08, schrieb Henk van den Toorn: > Hi Matt and Pierre-Alain, > > Thanks for your response. Pierre-Alain, I think you're right in saying > it's not an exact synonym. As Matt pointed out, the "energy" part of > the terms is confusing in itself. Please note HCD is not "High > Energy", but, according to Thermo, "Higher energy" CID. The collision > energy is not higher than CID, but the energy to keep the ions in the > C-lens is higher: > > https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_does_higher_in_HCD_Higher-energy_collisional_dissociation_mean > > Although the list of activation methods is nice and flat now, maybe > it's worth the consideration to split the CID term in a beam-type and > a trap-type sub-terms? > > Combining the activation types within the activation element is an > apparent solution for the EThcD, thank you for the suggestion. > > Regards, Henk > > > On 5/1/2014 9:03 PM, Chambers, Matthew wrote: > > Hi Henk, > > Combined activation techniques are covered by including CV terms > for both techniques in the activation element. Thus we don't need > combined terms. We already have a high-energy CID (HCD) term, but > it's true that referring to beam type CID as HCD is not > vendor-neutral. I'm fine with renaming the HCD term to "beam-type > collision induced dissociation" and making HCD a synonym. I don't > think a new term is necessary. The "high energy" part should IMO > have always been left to be specified by the collision voltage > parameter, since AFAIK the difference in fragmentation between LE > and HE CID is not that much different than changing the voltage > away from the "optimum" for either LE or HE. The beam vs. trap > part really does make a (orthogonal) difference though. > > -Matt > > On 5/1/2014 8:55 AM, Henk van den Toorn wrote: > > Dear community > > > I'd like to propose two new terms that should be able to > describe some fragmentation techniques that are not in the > vocabulary yet: > Children (is_a) of "dissociation method" (MS:1000044 > <https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ontology-lookup/?termId=MS%3A1000044>) > > The terms would be needed to describe HCD and ETHCD but in > more neutral terms. The exact synonyms are in fact the > vendor-specific terms so maybe they should be omitted. > > beam-type collision-induced dissociation > The dissociation of an ion after collisional excitation. > Exact synonym: HCD > > and > > electron transfer dissociation followed by beam-type > collision-induced dissociation > def: A process to fragment ions in a mass spectrometer by > inducing fragmentation of cations by transferring electrons to > them, after which the fragments are further dissociated using > beam-type collisional excitation. > Exact Synonym: EThcD > > Thank you, Henk van den Toorn > > Some references (taken from Wikipedia) > > 1. Frese, Christian K.; A. F. Maarten Altelaar, Henk van den > Toorn, Dirk Nolting, Jens Griep-Raming,Albert J. R. Heck, > and Shabaz Mohammed (November 20, 2012). "Toward full > peptide sequence coverage by dual fragmentation combining > electron-transfer and higher-energy collision dissociation > tandem mass spectrometry" > <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23106539/>. /Anal Chem/. > 2. Syka, John EP; Coon JJ, Schroeder MJ, Shabanowitz J, Hunt > DF (2004). "Peptide and protein sequence analysis by > electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry" > <http://www.pnas.org/content/101/26/9528>. /PNAS/ *101* > (26): 9528--9533. > 3. Olsen JV; Macek B, Lange O, Makarov A, Horning S, Mann M > (September 2007). "Higher-energy C-trap dissociation for > peptide modification analysis." > <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17721543/>. /Nature > methods/ *4* (9): 709--712. > 4. Frese, Christian K.; Houjiang Zhou,Thomas Taus, A. F. > Maarten Altelaar, Karl Mechtler,Albert J. R. Heck, and > Shabaz Mohammed (March 1, 2013). "Unambiguous Phosphosite > Localization using Electron-Transfer/Higher-Energy > Collision Dissociation (EThcD)" > <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588588/>. > /J Proteome Res/. > > -- > > ________________________________________ > > *Henk van den Toorn* > > Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics > Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute > for Pharmaceutical Sciences > > Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands > > > E-mail: h.w...@uu... > <mailto:h.w...@uu...>, Tel: +31 30 253 6758, Fax: > +31 30 253 6919 > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE > > Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get > > unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. > > Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Psidev-ms-vocab mailing list > > Psi...@li... <mailto:Psi...@li...> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-vocab > > -- > > ________________________________________ > > *Henk van den Toorn* > > Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics > Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for > Pharmaceutical Sciences > > Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands > > > E-mail: h.w...@uu... <mailto:h.w...@uu...>, Tel: > +31 30 253 6758, Fax: +31 30 253 6919 > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE > Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get > unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. > Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." > http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs > > > _______________________________________________ > Psidev-ms-vocab mailing list > Psi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-vocab -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de |
From: Gerhard M. <may...@ru...> - 2014-04-10 13:34:25
|
Dear proteomics community, attached you find the new version 3.63.0 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains a new term for a Paragon-specific search setting, two new terms for PEAKS scores and two new terms for ion series. Changed CV terms in version 3.63.0 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= ************ Slightly changed the definitions of the following ions series terms: [Term] id: MS:1001146 name: param: a ion-NH3 def: "Ion a-NH3 parameter information, type of product: a ion with lost ammonia." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search [Term] id: MS:1001148 name: param: a ion-H2O def: "Ion a-H2O if a significant and fragment includes STED." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search [Term] id: MS:1001149 name: param: b ion-NH3 def: "Ion b-NH3 parameter information, type of product: b ion with lost ammonia." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search [Term] id: MS:1001150 name: param: b ion-H2O def: "Ion b-H2O if b significant and fragment includes STED." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search [Term] id: MS:1001151 name: param: y ion-NH3 def: "Ion y-NH3 parameter information, type of product: y ion with lost ammonia." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search [Term] id: MS:1001152 name: param: y ion-H2O def: "Ion y-H2O if y significant and fragment includes STED." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search [Term] id: MS:1001232 name: frag: b ion - NH3 def: "Ion b-NH3 fragmentation information, type of product: b ion without ammonia." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002307 ! fragmentation ion type [Term] id: MS:1001233 name: frag: y ion - NH3 def: "Ion y-NH3 fragmentation information, type of product: y ion without ammonia." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002307 ! fragmentation ion type [Term] id: MS:1001235 name: frag: a ion - NH3 def: "Ion a-NH3 fragmentation information, type of product: a ion without ammonia." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002307 ! fragmentation ion type New CV terms in version 3.63.0 of psi-ms.obo: ============================================= [Term] id: MS:1002447 name: Paragon:special factor def: "The Paragon method setting indicating a list of one or more 'special factors', which generally capture secondary effects (relative to other settings) as a set of probabilities of modification features that override the assumed levels. For example the 'gel-based ID' special factor causes an increase probability of oxidation on several resides because of the air exposure impact on a gel, in addition to other effects." [PSI:PI] xref: value-type:xsd\:string "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1002421 ! Paragon input parameter [Term] id: MS:1002448 name: PEAKS:inChorusPeptideScore def: "The PEAKS inChorus peptide score." [PSI:PI] xref: value-type:xsd\:double "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1001143 ! search engine specific score for PSMs is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score [Term] id: MS:1002449 name: PEAKS:inChorusProteinScore def: "The PEAKS inChorus protein score." [PSI:PI] xref: value-type:xsd\:double "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1001116 ! single protein result details is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score [Term] id: MS:1002450 name: param: b ion-H3PO4 def: "Ion b-H3PO4: b ion with lost phosphoric acid." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search [Term] id: MS:1002451 name: param: y ion-H3PO4 def: "Ion y-H3PO4: y ion with lost phosphoric acid." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de |
From: Gerhard M. <may...@ru...> - 2014-04-07 13:44:57
|
Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.63.0_rc3 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains a new term for a Paragon-specific search setting, two new terms for PEAKS scores and two new terms for ion series. Changed CV terms in version 3.63.0_rc3 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== ************ Slightly changed the definitions of the following ions series terms: [Term] id: MS:1001146 name: param: a ion-NH3 def: "Ion a-NH3 parameter information, type of product: a ion with lost ammonium." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search [Term] id: MS:1001148 name: param: a ion-H2O def: "Ion a-H2O if a significant and fragment includes STED." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search [Term] id: MS:1001149 name: param: b ion-NH3 def: "Ion b-NH3 parameter information, type of product: b ion with lost ammonium." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search [Term] id: MS:1001150 name: param: b ion-H2O def: "Ion b-H2O if b significant and fragment includes STED." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search [Term] id: MS:1001151 name: param: y ion-NH3 def: "Ion y-NH3 parameter information, type of product: y ion with lost ammonium." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search [Term] id: MS:1001152 name: param: y ion-H2O def: "Ion y-H2O if y significant and fragment includes STED." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search New CV terms in version 3.63.0_rc3 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002447 name: Paragon:special factor def: "The Paragon method setting indicating a list of one or more 'special factors', which generally capture secondary effects (relative to other settings) as a set of probabilities of modification features that override the assumed levels. For example the 'gel-based ID' special factor causes an increase probability of oxidation on several resides because of the air exposure impact on a gel, in addition to other effects." [PSI:PI] xref: value-type:xsd\:string "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1002421 ! Paragon input parameter [Term] id: MS:1002448 name: PEAKS:inChorusPeptideScore def: "The PEAKS inChorus peptide score." [PSI:PI] xref: value-type:xsd\:double "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1001143 ! search engine specific score for PSMs is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score [Term] id: MS:1002449 name: PEAKS:inChorusProteinScore def: "The PEAKS inChorus protein score." [PSI:PI] xref: value-type:xsd\:double "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1001116 ! single protein result details is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score [Term] id: MS:1002450 name: param: b ion-H3PO4 def: "Ion b-H3PO4: b ion with lost phosphoric acid." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search [Term] id: MS:1002451 name: param: y ion-H3PO4 def: "Ion y-H3PO4: y ion with lost phosphoric acid." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001066 ! ions series considered in search Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de |
From: Jones, A. <And...@li...> - 2014-04-01 12:31:56
|
Hi all, Further to Eric’s message. If you have had any problems booking the hotel room, please let me know. Certainly there should still be rooms reserved, yet we’ve tried to book a room recently online and we’re not able to do it. The hotel are investigating the problem. Please don’t book rooms elsewhere, since if our room quota is not used up – we will be charged for unused rooms, Best wishes Andy From: Eric Deutsch [mailto:ede...@sy...] Sent: 29 March 2014 01:05 To: Mass spectrometry standard development; psi...@li...; Psi...@eb... Cc: Eric Deutsch Subject: [Psidev-ms-dev] PSI Meeting coming up soon Hi everyone, the PSI meeting is almost upon us. If you are planning on participating in the meeting and have not yet registered for the meeting, please do so very soon. The PSI meeting will take place at the Schloss Reinhartshausen Kempinski (Rudesheim, close to Frankfurt), Germany on April 13-16. Please don’t forget to register in the PSI web site, since we need to have the final numbers in the next few days: http://www.psidev.info/psi2014 Like in previous years, we have decided to use the PSI web page, since for logistics it is actually much easier for us to have a joint registration for the PSI, ProteomeXchange and IMEX meetings. Please, remember the schedule for that week: - HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI) meeting (April 13-16 am, http://www.psidev.info/). This time there will be also formal participation from the metabolomics community (COSMOS project, http://www.cosmos-fp7.eu/). - 4th ProteomeXchange meeting (April 16 pm-17). The idea is to finish shortly after lunch on April 17th. - At the same time partners of the IMEX consortium (for protein interaction databases) will have their annual meeting on April 16 pm-17, in the same venue. Regarding the accommodation, you need to do the reservation by yourself at the hotel (information is available at http://www.psidev.info/psi2014). You need to provide the keyword “PSI” to get the reduced rate. Please stay in that hotel because we have pre-booked a number of rooms that we will have to pay for anyway if they are not occupied. We look forward to seeing you there! Eric |
From: Gerhard M. <may...@ru...> - 2014-04-01 06:54:35
|
Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.63.0_rc2 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains a new term for a Paragon-specific search setting and two new terms for PEAKS scores. Changed CV terms in version 3.63.0_rc2 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.63.0_rc2 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002447 name: Paragon:special factor def: "The Paragon method setting indicating a list of one or more 'special factors', which generally capture secondary effects (relative to other settings) as a set of probabilities of modification features that override the assumed levels. For example the 'gel-based ID' special factor causes an increase probability of oxidation on several resides because of the air exposure impact on a gel, in addition to other effects." [PSI:PI] xref: value-type:xsd\:string "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1002421 ! Paragon input parameter [Term] id: MS:1002448 name: PEAKS:inChorusPeptideScore def: "The PEAKS inChorus peptide score." [PSI:PI] xref: value-type:xsd\:double "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1001143 ! search engine specific score for PSMs is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score [Term] id: MS:1002449 name: PEAKS:inChorusProteinScore def: "The PEAKS inChorus protein score." [PSI:PI] xref: value-type:xsd\:double "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1001116 ! single protein result details is_a: MS:1001153 ! search engine specific score Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de |
From: Eric D. <ede...@sy...> - 2014-03-29 01:05:25
|
Hi everyone, the PSI meeting is almost upon us. If you are planning on participating in the meeting and have not yet registered for the meeting, please do so very soon. The PSI meeting will take place at the *Schloss Reinhartshausen Kempinski *(Rudesheim, close to Frankfurt), Germany on *April 13-16*. *Please don't forget to register* in the PSI web site, since we need to have the final numbers in the next few days: http://www.psidev.info/psi2014 Like in previous years, we have decided to use the PSI web page, since for logistics it is actually much easier for us to have a joint registration for the PSI, ProteomeXchange and IMEX meetings. Please, remember the schedule for that week: - HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI) meeting (April 13-16 am, http://www.psidev.info/). This time there will be also formal participation from the metabolomics community (COSMOS project, http://www.cosmos-fp7.eu/). - 4th *ProteomeXchange meeting* (April 16 pm-17). The idea is to finish shortly after lunch on April 17th. - At the same time partners of the IMEX consortium (for protein interaction databases) will have their annual meeting on April 16 pm-17, in the same venue. Regarding the accommodation, *you need to do the reservation by yourself *at the hotel (information is available at http://www.psidev.info/psi2014). You need to provide the keyword *"PSI"* to get the reduced rate. Please *stay in that hotel because we have pre-booked a number of rooms that we will have to pay for anyway if they are not occupied. * We look forward to seeing you there! Eric |
From: Gerhard M. <may...@ru...> - 2014-03-26 07:33:39
|
Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.63.0_rc1 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains a new term for a Paragon-specific search setting. Changed CV terms in version 3.63.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.63.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002447 name: Paragon:special factor def: "The Paragon method setting indicating a list of one or more 'special factors', which generally capture secondary effects (relative to other settings) as a set of probabilities of modification features that override the assumed levels. For example the 'gel-based ID' special factor causes an increase probability of oxidation on several resides because of the air exposure impact on a gel, in addition to other effects." [PSI:PI] xref: value-type:xsd\:string "The allowed value-type for this CV term." is_a: MS:1002421 ! Paragon input parameter Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de |
From: Gerhard M. <Ger...@ru...> - 2014-03-19 08:21:29
|
Dear proteomics community, attached you find the new version 3.62.0 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains three new terms for Agilent instruments. Changed CV terms in version 3.62.0 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.62.0 of psi-ms.obo: ============================================= [Term] id: MS:1002444 name: 6420 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS def: "The 6420 Quadrupole LC/MS system is a Agilent liquid chromatography instrument combined with a Agilent triple quadrupole mass spectrometer." [PSI:MS] is_a: MS:1000490 ! Agilent instrument model [Term] id: MS:1002445 name: 6460 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS def: "The 6460 Quadrupole LC/MS system is a Agilent liquid chromatography instrument combined with a Agilent triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. It is similar to the 6420 but adds Agilent Jet Stream (AJS) technology to increase sensitivity." [PSI:MS] is_a: MS:1000490 ! Agilent instrument model [Term] id: MS:1002446 name: 6490 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS def: "The 6490 Quadrupole LC/MS system is a Agilent liquid chromatography instrument combined with a Agilent triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. It is similar to the 6420 but adds the Agilent iFunnel technology to increase sensitivity." [PSI:MS] is_a: MS:1000490 ! Agilent instrument model Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de |
From: Gerhard M. <Ger...@ru...> - 2014-03-13 15:22:22
|
Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.62.0_rc1 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains three new terms for Agilent instruments. Changed CV terms in version 3.62.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.62.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002444 name: 6420 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS def: "The 6420 Quadrupole LC/MS system is a Agilent liquid chromatography instrument combined with a Agilent triple quadrupole mass spectrometer." [PSI:MS] is_a: MS:1000490 ! Agilent instrument model [Term] id: MS:1002445 name: 6460 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS def: "The 6460 Quadrupole LC/MS system is a Agilent liquid chromatography instrument combined with a Agilent triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. It is similar to the 6420 but adds Agilent Jet Stream (AJS) technology to increase sensitivity." [PSI:MS] is_a: MS:1000490 ! Agilent instrument model [Term] id: MS:1002446 name: 6490 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS def: "The 6490 Quadrupole LC/MS system is a Agilent liquid chromatography instrument combined with a Agilent triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. It is similar to the 6420 but adds the Agilent iFunnel technology to increase sensitivity." [PSI:MS] is_a: MS:1000490 ! Agilent instrument model Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de |
From: Eric D. <ede...@sy...> - 2014-03-12 20:57:51
|
Hi everyone, I would like to propose the following new terms for some instruments that we seem to be missing in the CV: [Term] id: MS:100???? name: 6420 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS def: "The 6420 Quadrupole LC/MS system is a Agilent liquid chromatography instrument combined with a Agilent triple quadrupole mass spectrometer." [PSI:MS] is_a: MS:1000490 ! Agilent instrument model [Term] id: MS:100???? name: 6460 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS def: "The 6460 Quadrupole LC/MS system is a Agilent liquid chromatography instrument combined with a Agilent triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. It is similar to the 6420 but adds Agilent Jet Stream (AJS) technology to increase sensitivity." [PSI:MS] is_a: MS:1000490 ! Agilent instrument model [Term] id: MS:100???? name: 6490 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS def: "The 6490 Quadrupole LC/MS system is a Agilent liquid chromatography instrument combined with a Agilent triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. It is similar to the 6420 but adds the Agilent iFunnel technology to increase sensitivity." [PSI:MS] is_a: MS:1000490 ! Agilent instrument model I modeled these entries after MS:1000477. Any comments, corrections, or additions? I left out the resolution and range information present in MS:1000477 since I don't know it for these instruments. Thanks, Eric |
From: Gerhard M. <Ger...@ru...> - 2014-03-05 08:09:07
|
Dear proteomics community, attached you find the new version 3.61.0 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains new CV terms for flagging the SpectrumIdentificationLists in mzIdentML version 1.2 and terms for the netCDF ANDI file formats. Changed CV terms in version 3.61.0 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.61.0 of psi-ms.obo: ============================================= [Term] id: MS:1002438 name: spectrum identification list result details def: "Information about the list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList)." [PSI:PI] relationship: part_of MS:1001000 ! spectrum interpretation [Term] id: MS:1002439 name: final PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum must not be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002440 name: intermediate PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is not the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. This term should be used when results are provided from multiple search engines for the results from each search engine before they are combined to give consensus identifications. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum may be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002441 name: Andi-MS format def: "AIA Analytical Data Interchange file format for mass spectrometry data." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1000560 ! mass spectrometer file format [Term] id: MS:1002442 name: chromatograph file format def: "The format of the chromatography file being used. This could be a instrument or vendor specific proprietary file format or a converted open file format." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001459 ! file format [Term] id: MS:1002443 name: Andi-CHROM format def: "AIA Analytical Data Interchange file format for chromatography data." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002442 ! chromatograph file format Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de |
From: Karl C. <cl...@br...> - 2014-02-27 16:42:45
|
Andy, I cant think of a good reason for separately counting modified and unmodified peptides when doing a peptide-level FDR analysis. When you mention that the spectra might be quite different, my thought is: so why does that really matter? And even if they are the differences will be on the order of the differences between 2 different precursor charge states of an unmodified peptide. So why treat precursor charges and mods differently? Instead I think the more important question comes back to what one is trying to capture with a peptide-level metric. I believe that a peptide-level metric is usually oriented toward measuring extent of protein identification and depth of peptide coverage of a sample. In that sense, counting modified forms separately is going to skew the metric by inappropriately inflating your peptide count in a whole proteome experiment with sampling handling effects (i.e. oxidized Met, deamidated Asn, etc). If one is working with a dataset from a PTM enrichment experiment (phospho, acetyl, ubiquitin), then the core metric is more suited to a site-level collapsing than a peptide-level collapsing. Furthermore, when I said site-level, I mean driven by the primary site type of interest i.e. in a phospho-enriched PTM dataset, sample handling artifacts like oxidized/unoxidized Met for the same phosphosite would be collapsed together, while PTMs like 2 differently localized phosphosites in the same peptide would be kept separate. The best reason I can think of for counting modified and unmodified peptides separately when doing a peptide-level analysis, is when one would prefer to have a site-level analysis for an enriched PTM dataset, but the particular software platform being used isnt sophisticated enough to have implemented site-level collapsing (requires a site-localization metric on each identification). So instead a crude mod vs unmod separation has been implemented by collapsing base on precursor MH+ and sequence, or case insensitive sequence comparison (when mods are indicated by lower case). --Karl From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:51 AM To: 'Mass spectrometry standard development'; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...' Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Im interested to hear this discussion. Were currently implementing peptide-level FDR analysis in our mzidLibrary software, and were working on the basis of peptide+modification site being the distinct unit for our calculation, but Karls email indicates to me that there isnt consensus on how this is done. For the purposes of global stats, I understood that one of the reasons for doing peptide-level stats was that there could be a consistent incorrect assignment occurring across all spectra reporting on the same peptide. The spectra for a modified peptide would be rather different from the unmodified peptide, so I dont understand the logic for collapsing these down into one entry (except for protein inference by a peptide sequence centric approach). Best wishes Andy From: Karl Clauser [mailto:cl...@br...] Sent: 27 February 2014 14:30 To: 'Mass spectrometry standard development'; psi...@li...; psi...@li... Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi folks, I just wanted to chime in here that I think Eric's definition of distinct peptide is pretty close to that which is the most widely-implemented interpretation. >distinct peptide - a distinct sequence of amino acids irrespective of mass modifications or charge. It is most applicable when one is doing protein parsimony and reporting a peptide-level FDR. It is also consistent with the MCP publication guidelines. I'm not sure I see much practical use for > modified peptide - one species of distinct peptide with a specific mass-modification configuration, but irrespective of charge. Instead I'd like to toss into the discussion a related concept (modification site), which is often used in papers that enrich for a particular PTM (phospho, acetyl, ubiquitin). While the concept is often used there isn't really a generic name. For example it is used when reporting the total number of phosphosites observed, since the count of unique peptides isn't usually relevant. Modification site a particular modification localized to a specific position in the protein sequence, irrespective of precursor charge, missed cleavage state, or precursor mass. When collapsing a set of PSM's to the site level, allowing for different missed cleavage states is challenging because one typically needs to know the AA position in the intact protein sequence, thus protein parsimony issues arise. Note that when counting the total number of phosphosites identified/quantified, if a particular site is located in peptide that has another nearby site then the singly and doubly phosphorylated observations of those are often reported separately because they may be regulated differently and have dissimilar quantitative behavior. --Karl -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:46 AM To: 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development'; 'psi...@li...' Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi all, Wow - I didn't realise my request for a new CV term would open such a can of worms :-) Probably it makes sense to defer this update (support for peptide-level stats) and discuss as an agenda item at the PSI meeting in April, then do as a minor update to mzid 1.2 at a later stage? I want to get mzid 1.2 in process ASAP, and I don't think we'll get this resolved very easily, since as you mention there are lots of different ways of doing "peptide-level stats", and we should try get it right. Cheers Andy -----Original Message----- From: Seymour, Sean L [ <mailto:Sea...@ab...> mailto:Sea...@ab...] Sent: 26 February 2014 17:55 To: Eric Deutsch; Mass spectrometry standard development; <mailto:psi...@li...> psi...@li...; <mailto:psi...@li...> psi...@li... Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi Eric, I like your breakdown of the concepts, but not all the names. Your 'distinct peptide' is really a 'sequence' to me. And I'm not too crazy about using 'modified peptide' as the term for what I described as my view of what a 'peptide' is, particularly because this would have to apply to unmodified peptides as well. While I find myself using them, I find the modifiers 'distinct' and 'unique' to be ambiguous as well, since these are used by some framings of protein inference to refer to a peptide or sequence's degree of specificity to just one protein. I guess this is where I come back to 'peptide' and 'sequence' having the most straightforward meaning if we insist on clear definitions most consistent with what those words really mean and would be understood to mean outside of our little domain. I'm fine with 'PSM' and 'Peptide ion' for your first two, but would prefer just 'Peptide' and 'Sequence' for the last two. A peptide is an actual compound that has a structural formula and a sequence has...well, a sequence. It's also not completely clear to me from the definition of the third if you count different arrangements of the same mods on the same sequence as different peptides. From the chemist's perspective, they are different. They would come in different vials from a different number in a catalog and have different structural formulae. I think that's what you mean, but it could be spelled out a little more. I definitely think we can agree on terms but allow room for slightly varied concepts for things deeply interior to our domain. We were should really try to agree and use things consistently is where our domain interfaces with other who don't understand all the fine points of mass spec and proteomics. This is where I think the terms 'peptide' and 'sequence' are particularly important. No biologist should ever have to know or care about a PSM or how many charge states a peptide ionizes to in a mass spec. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Eric Deutsch [ <mailto:ede...@sy...> mailto:ede...@sy...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:29 AM To: Mass spectrometry standard development; Seymour, Sean L; <mailto:psi...@li...> psi...@li...; <mailto:psi...@li...> psi...@li... Cc: Eric Deutsch Subject: RE: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo FWIW, these are the terms we try to use (PeptideAtlas/TPP): PSM - peptide-spectrum match - one instance of a spectrum matched to a specific peptide ion. peptide ion - one species of distinct peptide with a specific charge state and mass-modification configuration. modified peptide - one species of distinct peptide with a specific mass-modification configuration, but irrespective of charge. distinct peptide - a distinct sequence of amino acids irrespective of mass modifications or charge. We try not to use peptide by itself because it is so ambiguous. Do you think it's possible to all agree on a set of terms and definitions? E -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [ <mailto:And...@li...> mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:57 AM To: 'Seymour, Sean L'; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Totally agree with what you're saying here - I think my concept of peptide I intended here was the same as yours, but much less well elaborated. I agree these terms have not been clearly defined by us ever, and perhaps we should add a reference guide somewhere on the PSI site or in the mzid 1.2 spec doc we can refer to when we say "distinct peptide", "PSM" etc. -----Original Message----- From: Seymour, Sean L [ <mailto:Sea...@ab...> mailto:Sea...@ab...] Sent: 26 February 2014 16:50 To: Jones, Andy; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: RE: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi all, If we're going to go down the very useful road of capturing attributes at the level of the peptide, I think we need to very clearly define what we mean by a peptide. To anyone with a chemistry background like myself, a peptide would mean a structurally unique molecule. Different charges states of this molecule are not different peptides, they are derivative states that arise from the analytical process in the mass spec. Different modification states of a sequence are different peptides. Different arrangements of the same modifications on the same sequence are different peptides. The same exact match to two different spectra is one peptide, not two peptides. While this view may seem obvious to some of you, there is a great range of how this term is used in my experience, including violation of all of the previous specific statements. Perhaps we've already clearly defined 'peptide' somewhere, and I don't need to say this, but I think this is very important so I want to be sure. I'm very much in favor of including concepts at this level since it is more aligned with the physical analyte, sheds redundancy complications, and is more useful when moving to targeted analyses via MRM or DIA. It might be useful to develop/collect all our terms at this level to be sure we've defined them right. Many concepts at the spectrum level have an analog at the peptide level so it may be useful to map this out as well - ex RT of MS2 trigger vs. RT of the peptide apex of elution. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [ <mailto:And...@li...> mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:24 AM To: 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Thanks for this Gerhard. Apologies, I discovered a further term which we would like added (discussed here: <http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=80> http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=80): Term: "best PSM per peptide" No value slot Def: "To support peptide-level statistical approaches or scores, this term SHOULD be used to annotate the best scoring PSM reporting on a given distinct peptide (sequence and modifications distinct)" -----Original Message----- From: Gerhard Mayer [ <mailto:Ger...@ru...> mailto:Ger...@ru...] Sent: 26 February 2014 14:45 To: <mailto:psi...@li...> psi...@li...; <mailto:psi...@li...> psi...@li...; Mass spectrometry standard development Subject: [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains two new CV terms for flagging the SpectrumIdentificationLists in mzIdentML version 1.2. Changed CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002438 name: spectrum identification list result details def: "Information about the list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList)." [PSI:PI] relationship: part_of MS:1001000 ! spectrum interpretation [Term] id: MS:1002439 name: final PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum must not be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002440 name: intermediate PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is not the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. This term should be used when results are provided from multiple search engines for the results from each search engine before they are combined to give consensus identifications. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum may be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: <mailto:ger...@ru...> ger...@ru... Web: <http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de> http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. <http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-pi-dev mailing list <mailto:Psi...@li...> Psi...@li... <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-pi-dev> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-pi-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. <http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-dev mailing list <mailto:Psi...@li...> Psi...@li... <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. <http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktr k> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-vocab mailing list <mailto:Psi...@li...> Psi...@li... <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-vocab> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-vocab ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. <http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktr k> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-dev mailing list <mailto:Psi...@li...> Psi...@li... <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev |
From: Gerhard M. <Ger...@ru...> - 2014-02-27 16:12:59
|
Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.61.0_rc2 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains new CV terms for flagging the SpectrumIdentificationLists in mzIdentML version 1.2 and for netCDF ANDI file formats. Changed CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc2 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc2 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002438 name: spectrum identification list result details def: "Information about the list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList)." [PSI:PI] relationship: part_of MS:1001000 ! spectrum interpretation [Term] id: MS:1002439 name: final PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum must not be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002440 name: intermediate PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is not the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. This term should be used when results are provided from multiple search engines for the results from each search engine before they are combined to give consensus identifications. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum may be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002441 name: Andi-MS format def: "AIA Analytical Data Interchange file format for mass spectrometry data." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1000560 ! mass spectrometer file format [Term] id: MS:1002442 name: chromatograph file format def: "The format of the chromatography file being used. This could be a instrument or vendor specific proprietary file format or a converted open file format." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1001459 ! file format [Term] id: MS:1002443 name: Andi-CHROM format def: "AIA Analytical Data Interchange file format for chromatography data." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002442 ! chromatograph file format Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de |
From: Eric D. <ede...@sy...> - 2014-02-27 16:10:49
|
Great, thanks, this is a good discussion. It will be difficult to achieve consensus, I suspect, but it's worth trying and doing the best we can. I'm not sure what to make of Matt's suggestions of acronyms. On the one hand, they're very specific and allow a long string of precise wording to be condensed into a short object, but on the other hand, having a flotilla of similar acronyms will probably seem ridiculous to all but a few of us who think ontologies are a really neat idea. In response to Sean's specific question: we view a "modified peptide" to have a very specific mass modification configuration, e.g. phososerine on the 8th residue. We do not have a term for a specific peptide sequence with two phospho mods at unspecified locations.. maybe we should define that concept as well. Perhaps it makes sense to define all (most of) the possible concepts clearly and assign them a specific acronym, and then assign terse common names the most relevant ones. Tricky. Thanks for chiming in, Karl. I think including PTM localization terms as part of the definition set would be great. I've occasionally struggled to find the right terms to describe a location/site where I think I know the PTM is (or for which I have very strong evidence) versus a location/site where the PTM might possibly be, among many. If we can achieve consistent terminology for that, that might well be helpful. Thanks, Eric *From:* Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] *Sent:* Thursday, February 27, 2014 6:51 AM *To:* 'Mass spectrometry standard development'; ' psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li... ' *Subject:* Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo I'm interested to hear this discussion. We're currently implementing peptide-level FDR analysis in our mzidLibrary software, and were working on the basis of "peptide+modification site" being the distinct unit for our calculation, but Karl's email indicates to me that there isn't consensus on how this is done. For the purposes of global stats, I understood that one of the reasons for doing peptide-level stats was that there could be a consistent incorrect assignment occurring across all spectra reporting on the same peptide. The spectra for a modified peptide would be rather different from the unmodified peptide, so I don't understand the logic for collapsing these down into one entry (except for protein inference by a peptide sequence centric approach). Best wishes Andy *From:* Karl Clauser [mailto:cl...@br...<cl...@br...>] *Sent:* 27 February 2014 14:30 *To:* 'Mass spectrometry standard development'; psi...@li...; psi...@li... *Subject:* Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi folks, I just wanted to chime in here that I think Eric's definition of distinct peptide is pretty close to that which is the most widely-implemented interpretation. >distinct peptide - a distinct sequence of amino acids irrespective of mass modifications or charge. It is most applicable when one is doing protein parsimony and reporting a peptide-level FDR. It is also consistent with the MCP publication guidelines. I'm not sure I see much practical use for > modified peptide - one species of distinct peptide with a specific mass-modification configuration, but irrespective of charge. Instead I'd like to toss into the discussion a related concept (modification site), which is often used in papers that enrich for a particular PTM (phospho, acetyl, ubiquitin). While the concept is often used there isn't really a generic name. For example it is used when reporting the total number of phosphosites observed, since the count of unique peptides isn't usually relevant. Modification site - a particular modification localized to a specific position in the protein sequence, irrespective of precursor charge, missed cleavage state, or precursor mass. When collapsing a set of PSM's to the site level, allowing for different missed cleavage states is challenging because one typically needs to know the AA position in the intact protein sequence, thus protein parsimony issues arise. Note that when counting the total number of phosphosites identified/quantified, if a particular site is located in peptide that has another nearby site then the singly and doubly phosphorylated observations of those are often reported separately because they may be regulated differently and have dissimilar quantitative behavior. --Karl -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...<And...@li...>] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:46 AM To: 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development'; 'psi...@li...' Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi all, Wow - I didn't realise my request for a new CV term would open such a can of worms :-) Probably it makes sense to defer this update (support for peptide-level stats) and discuss as an agenda item at the PSI meeting in April, then do as a minor update to mzid 1.2 at a later stage? I want to get mzid 1.2 in process ASAP, and I don't think we'll get this resolved very easily, since as you mention there are lots of different ways of doing "peptide-level stats", and we should try get it right. Cheers Andy -----Original Message----- From: Seymour, Sean L [mailto:Sea...@ab...<Sea...@ab...> ] Sent: 26 February 2014 17:55 To: Eric Deutsch; Mass spectrometry standard development; psi...@li...; psi...@li... Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi Eric, I like your breakdown of the concepts, but not all the names. Your 'distinct peptide' is really a 'sequence' to me. And I'm not too crazy about using 'modified peptide' as the term for what I described as my view of what a 'peptide' is, particularly because this would have to apply to unmodified peptides as well. While I find myself using them, I find the modifiers 'distinct' and 'unique' to be ambiguous as well, since these are used by some framings of protein inference to refer to a peptide or sequence's degree of specificity to just one protein. I guess this is where I come back to 'peptide' and 'sequence' having the most straightforward meaning if we insist on clear definitions most consistent with what those words really mean and would be understood to mean outside of our little domain. I'm fine with 'PSM' and 'Peptide ion' for your first two, but would prefer just 'Peptide' and 'Sequence' for the last two. A peptide is an actual compound that has a structural formula and a sequence has...well, a sequence. It's also not completely clear to me from the definition of the third if you count different arrangements of the same mods on the same sequence as different peptides. From the chemist's perspective, they are different. They would come in different vials from a different number in a catalog and have different structural formulae. I think that's what you mean, but it could be spelled out a little more. I definitely think we can agree on terms but allow room for slightly varied concepts for things deeply interior to our domain. We were should really try to agree and use things consistently is where our domain interfaces with other who don't understand all the fine points of mass spec and proteomics. This is where I think the terms 'peptide' and 'sequence' are particularly important. No biologist should ever have to know or care about a PSM or how many charge states a peptide ionizes to in a mass spec. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Eric Deutsch [mailto:ede...@sy...<ede...@sy...> ] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:29 AM To: Mass spectrometry standard development; Seymour, Sean L; psi...@li...; psi...@li... Cc: Eric Deutsch Subject: RE: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo FWIW, these are the terms we try to use (PeptideAtlas/TPP): PSM - peptide-spectrum match - one instance of a spectrum matched to a specific peptide ion. peptide ion - one species of distinct peptide with a specific charge state and mass-modification configuration. modified peptide - one species of distinct peptide with a specific mass-modification configuration, but irrespective of charge. distinct peptide - a distinct sequence of amino acids irrespective of mass modifications or charge. We try not to use peptide by itself because it is so ambiguous. Do you think it's possible to all agree on a set of terms and definitions? E -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...<And...@li...> ] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:57 AM To: 'Seymour, Sean L'; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Totally agree with what you're saying here - I think my concept of peptide I intended here was the same as yours, but much less well elaborated. I agree these terms have not been clearly defined by us ever, and perhaps we should add a reference guide somewhere on the PSI site or in the mzid 1.2 spec doc we can refer to when we say "distinct peptide", "PSM" etc. -----Original Message----- From: Seymour, Sean L [mailto:Sea...@ab...<Sea...@ab...> ] Sent: 26 February 2014 16:50 To: Jones, Andy; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: RE: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi all, If we're going to go down the very useful road of capturing attributes at the level of the peptide, I think we need to very clearly define what we mean by a peptide. To anyone with a chemistry background like myself, a peptide would mean a structurally unique molecule. Different charges states of this molecule are not different peptides, they are derivative states that arise from the analytical process in the mass spec. Different modification states of a sequence are different peptides. Different arrangements of the same modifications on the same sequence are different peptides. The same exact match to two different spectra is one peptide, not two peptides. While this view may seem obvious to some of you, there is a great range of how this term is used in my experience, including violation of all of the previous specific statements. Perhaps we've already clearly defined 'peptide' somewhere, and I don't need to say this, but I think this is very important so I want to be sure. I'm very much in favor of including concepts at this level since it is more aligned with the physical analyte, sheds redundancy complications, and is more useful when moving to targeted analyses via MRM or DIA. It might be useful to develop/collect all our terms at this level to be sure we've defined them right. Many concepts at the spectrum level have an analog at the peptide level so it may be useful to map this out as well - ex RT of MS2 trigger vs. RT of the peptide apex of elution. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...<And...@li...> ] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:24 AM To: 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Thanks for this Gerhard. Apologies, I discovered a further term which we would like added (discussed here: http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=80): Term: "best PSM per peptide" No value slot Def: "To support peptide-level statistical approaches or scores, this term SHOULD be used to annotate the best scoring PSM reporting on a given distinct peptide (sequence and modifications distinct)" -----Original Message----- From: Gerhard Mayer [mailto:Ger...@ru...<Ger...@ru...> ] Sent: 26 February 2014 14:45 To: psi...@li...; psi...@li...; Mass spectrometry standard development Subject: [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains two new CV terms for flagging the SpectrumIdentificationLists in mzIdentML version 1.2. Changed CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002438 name: spectrum identification list result details def: "Information about the list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList)." [PSI:PI] relationship: part_of MS:1001000 ! spectrum interpretation [Term] id: MS:1002439 name: final PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum must not be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002440 name: intermediate PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is not the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. This term should be used when results are provided from multiple search engines for the results from each search engine before they are combined to give consensus identifications. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum may be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-pi-dev mailing list Psi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-pi-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-dev mailing list Psi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-vocab mailing list Psi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-vocab ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-dev mailing list Psi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev |
From: Jones, A. <And...@li...> - 2014-02-27 14:50:49
|
I’m interested to hear this discussion. We’re currently implementing peptide-level FDR analysis in our mzidLibrary software, and were working on the basis of “peptide+modification site” being the distinct unit for our calculation, but Karl’s email indicates to me that there isn’t consensus on how this is done. For the purposes of global stats, I understood that one of the reasons for doing peptide-level stats was that there could be a consistent incorrect assignment occurring across all spectra reporting on the same peptide. The spectra for a modified peptide would be rather different from the unmodified peptide, so I don’t understand the logic for collapsing these down into one entry (except for protein inference by a peptide sequence centric approach). Best wishes Andy From: Karl Clauser [mailto:cl...@br...] Sent: 27 February 2014 14:30 To: 'Mass spectrometry standard development'; psi...@li...; psi...@li... Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi folks, I just wanted to chime in here that I think Eric's definition of distinct peptide is pretty close to that which is the most widely-implemented interpretation. >distinct peptide - a distinct sequence of amino acids irrespective of mass modifications or charge. It is most applicable when one is doing protein parsimony and reporting a peptide-level FDR. It is also consistent with the MCP publication guidelines. I'm not sure I see much practical use for > modified peptide - one species of distinct peptide with a specific mass-modification configuration, but irrespective of charge. Instead I'd like to toss into the discussion a related concept (modification site), which is often used in papers that enrich for a particular PTM (phospho, acetyl, ubiquitin). While the concept is often used there isn't really a generic name. For example it is used when reporting the total number of phosphosites observed, since the count of unique peptides isn't usually relevant. Modification site – a particular modification localized to a specific position in the protein sequence, irrespective of precursor charge, missed cleavage state, or precursor mass. When collapsing a set of PSM's to the site level, allowing for different missed cleavage states is challenging because one typically needs to know the AA position in the intact protein sequence, thus protein parsimony issues arise. Note that when counting the total number of phosphosites identified/quantified, if a particular site is located in peptide that has another nearby site then the singly and doubly phosphorylated observations of those are often reported separately because they may be regulated differently and have dissimilar quantitative behavior. --Karl -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:46 AM To: 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development'; 'psi...@li...' Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi all, Wow - I didn't realise my request for a new CV term would open such a can of worms :-) Probably it makes sense to defer this update (support for peptide-level stats) and discuss as an agenda item at the PSI meeting in April, then do as a minor update to mzid 1.2 at a later stage? I want to get mzid 1.2 in process ASAP, and I don't think we'll get this resolved very easily, since as you mention there are lots of different ways of doing "peptide-level stats", and we should try get it right. Cheers Andy -----Original Message----- From: Seymour, Sean L [mailto:Sea...@ab...] Sent: 26 February 2014 17:55 To: Eric Deutsch; Mass spectrometry standard development; psi...@li...<mailto:psi...@li...>; psi...@li...<mailto:psi...@li...> Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi Eric, I like your breakdown of the concepts, but not all the names. Your 'distinct peptide' is really a 'sequence' to me. And I'm not too crazy about using 'modified peptide' as the term for what I described as my view of what a 'peptide' is, particularly because this would have to apply to unmodified peptides as well. While I find myself using them, I find the modifiers 'distinct' and 'unique' to be ambiguous as well, since these are used by some framings of protein inference to refer to a peptide or sequence's degree of specificity to just one protein. I guess this is where I come back to 'peptide' and 'sequence' having the most straightforward meaning if we insist on clear definitions most consistent with what those words really mean and would be understood to mean outside of our little domain. I'm fine with 'PSM' and 'Peptide ion' for your first two, but would prefer just 'Peptide' and 'Sequence' for the last two. A peptide is an actual compound that has a structural formula and a sequence has...well, a sequence. It's also not completely clear to me from the definition of the third if you count different arrangements of the same mods on the same sequence as different peptides. From the chemist's perspective, they are different. They would come in different vials from a different number in a catalog and have different structural formulae. I think that's what you mean, but it could be spelled out a little more. I definitely think we can agree on terms but allow room for slightly varied concepts for things deeply interior to our domain. We were should really try to agree and use things consistently is where our domain interfaces with other who don't understand all the fine points of mass spec and proteomics. This is where I think the terms 'peptide' and 'sequence' are particularly important. No biologist should ever have to know or care about a PSM or how many charge states a peptide ionizes to in a mass spec. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Eric Deutsch [mailto:ede...@sy...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:29 AM To: Mass spectrometry standard development; Seymour, Sean L; psi...@li...<mailto:psi...@li...>; psi...@li...<mailto:psi...@li...> Cc: Eric Deutsch Subject: RE: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo FWIW, these are the terms we try to use (PeptideAtlas/TPP): PSM - peptide-spectrum match - one instance of a spectrum matched to a specific peptide ion. peptide ion - one species of distinct peptide with a specific charge state and mass-modification configuration. modified peptide - one species of distinct peptide with a specific mass-modification configuration, but irrespective of charge. distinct peptide - a distinct sequence of amino acids irrespective of mass modifications or charge. We try not to use peptide by itself because it is so ambiguous. Do you think it's possible to all agree on a set of terms and definitions? E -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:57 AM To: 'Seymour, Sean L'; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Totally agree with what you're saying here - I think my concept of peptide I intended here was the same as yours, but much less well elaborated. I agree these terms have not been clearly defined by us ever, and perhaps we should add a reference guide somewhere on the PSI site or in the mzid 1.2 spec doc we can refer to when we say "distinct peptide", "PSM" etc. -----Original Message----- From: Seymour, Sean L [mailto:Sea...@ab...] Sent: 26 February 2014 16:50 To: Jones, Andy; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: RE: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi all, If we're going to go down the very useful road of capturing attributes at the level of the peptide, I think we need to very clearly define what we mean by a peptide. To anyone with a chemistry background like myself, a peptide would mean a structurally unique molecule. Different charges states of this molecule are not different peptides, they are derivative states that arise from the analytical process in the mass spec. Different modification states of a sequence are different peptides. Different arrangements of the same modifications on the same sequence are different peptides. The same exact match to two different spectra is one peptide, not two peptides. While this view may seem obvious to some of you, there is a great range of how this term is used in my experience, including violation of all of the previous specific statements. Perhaps we've already clearly defined 'peptide' somewhere, and I don't need to say this, but I think this is very important so I want to be sure. I'm very much in favor of including concepts at this level since it is more aligned with the physical analyte, sheds redundancy complications, and is more useful when moving to targeted analyses via MRM or DIA. It might be useful to develop/collect all our terms at this level to be sure we've defined them right. Many concepts at the spectrum level have an analog at the peptide level so it may be useful to map this out as well - ex RT of MS2 trigger vs. RT of the peptide apex of elution. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:24 AM To: 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Thanks for this Gerhard. Apologies, I discovered a further term which we would like added (discussed here: http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=80): Term: "best PSM per peptide" No value slot Def: "To support peptide-level statistical approaches or scores, this term SHOULD be used to annotate the best scoring PSM reporting on a given distinct peptide (sequence and modifications distinct)" -----Original Message----- From: Gerhard Mayer [mailto:Ger...@ru...] Sent: 26 February 2014 14:45 To: psi...@li...<mailto:psi...@li...>; psi...@li...<mailto:psi...@li...>; Mass spectrometry standard development Subject: [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains two new CV terms for flagging the SpectrumIdentificationLists in mzIdentML version 1.2. Changed CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002438 name: spectrum identification list result details def: "Information about the list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList)." [PSI:PI] relationship: part_of MS:1001000 ! spectrum interpretation [Term] id: MS:1002439 name: final PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum must not be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002440 name: intermediate PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is not the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. This term should be used when results are provided from multiple search engines for the results from each search engine before they are combined to give consensus identifications. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum may be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru...<mailto:ger...@ru...> Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-pi-dev mailing list Psi...@li...<mailto:Psi...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-pi-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-dev mailing list Psi...@li...<mailto:Psi...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-vocab mailing list Psi...@li...<mailto:Psi...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-vocab ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-dev mailing list Psi...@li...<mailto:Psi...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev |
From: Karl C. <cl...@br...> - 2014-02-27 14:30:10
|
Hi folks, I just wanted to chime in here that I think Eric's definition of distinct peptide is pretty close to that which is the most widely-implemented interpretation. >distinct peptide - a distinct sequence of amino acids irrespective of mass modifications or charge. It is most applicable when one is doing protein parsimony and reporting a peptide-level FDR. It is also consistent with the MCP publication guidelines. I'm not sure I see much practical use for > modified peptide - one species of distinct peptide with a specific mass-modification configuration, but irrespective of charge. Instead I'd like to toss into the discussion a related concept (modification site), which is often used in papers that enrich for a particular PTM (phospho, acetyl, ubiquitin). While the concept is often used there isn't really a generic name. For example it is used when reporting the total number of phosphosites observed, since the count of unique peptides isn't usually relevant. Modification site a particular modification localized to a specific position in the protein sequence, irrespective of precursor charge, missed cleavage state, or precursor mass. When collapsing a set of PSM's to the site level, allowing for different missed cleavage states is challenging because one typically needs to know the AA position in the intact protein sequence, thus protein parsimony issues arise. Note that when counting the total number of phosphosites identified/quantified, if a particular site is located in peptide that has another nearby site then the singly and doubly phosphorylated observations of those are often reported separately because they may be regulated differently and have dissimilar quantitative behavior. --Karl -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:46 AM To: 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development'; 'psi...@li...' Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi all, Wow - I didn't realise my request for a new CV term would open such a can of worms :-) Probably it makes sense to defer this update (support for peptide-level stats) and discuss as an agenda item at the PSI meeting in April, then do as a minor update to mzid 1.2 at a later stage? I want to get mzid 1.2 in process ASAP, and I don't think we'll get this resolved very easily, since as you mention there are lots of different ways of doing "peptide-level stats", and we should try get it right. Cheers Andy -----Original Message----- From: Seymour, Sean L [ <mailto:Sea...@ab...> mailto:Sea...@ab...] Sent: 26 February 2014 17:55 To: Eric Deutsch; Mass spectrometry standard development; <mailto:psi...@li...> psi...@li...; <mailto:psi...@li...> psi...@li... Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi Eric, I like your breakdown of the concepts, but not all the names. Your 'distinct peptide' is really a 'sequence' to me. And I'm not too crazy about using 'modified peptide' as the term for what I described as my view of what a 'peptide' is, particularly because this would have to apply to unmodified peptides as well. While I find myself using them, I find the modifiers 'distinct' and 'unique' to be ambiguous as well, since these are used by some framings of protein inference to refer to a peptide or sequence's degree of specificity to just one protein. I guess this is where I come back to 'peptide' and 'sequence' having the most straightforward meaning if we insist on clear definitions most consistent with what those words really mean and would be understood to mean outside of our little domain. I'm fine with 'PSM' and 'Peptide ion' for your first two, but would prefer just 'Peptide' and 'Sequence' for the last two. A peptide is an actual compound that has a structural formula and a sequence has...well, a sequence. It's also not completely clear to me from the definition of the third if you count different arrangements of the same mods on the same sequence as different peptides. From the chemist's perspective, they are different. They would come in different vials from a different number in a catalog and have different structural formulae. I think that's what you mean, but it could be spelled out a little more. I definitely think we can agree on terms but allow room for slightly varied concepts for things deeply interior to our domain. We were should really try to agree and use things consistently is where our domain interfaces with other who don't understand all the fine points of mass spec and proteomics. This is where I think the terms 'peptide' and 'sequence' are particularly important. No biologist should ever have to know or care about a PSM or how many charge states a peptide ionizes to in a mass spec. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Eric Deutsch [ <mailto:ede...@sy...> mailto:ede...@sy...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:29 AM To: Mass spectrometry standard development; Seymour, Sean L; <mailto:psi...@li...> psi...@li...; <mailto:psi...@li...> psi...@li... Cc: Eric Deutsch Subject: RE: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo FWIW, these are the terms we try to use (PeptideAtlas/TPP): PSM - peptide-spectrum match - one instance of a spectrum matched to a specific peptide ion. peptide ion - one species of distinct peptide with a specific charge state and mass-modification configuration. modified peptide - one species of distinct peptide with a specific mass-modification configuration, but irrespective of charge. distinct peptide - a distinct sequence of amino acids irrespective of mass modifications or charge. We try not to use peptide by itself because it is so ambiguous. Do you think it's possible to all agree on a set of terms and definitions? E -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [ <mailto:And...@li...> mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:57 AM To: 'Seymour, Sean L'; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Totally agree with what you're saying here - I think my concept of peptide I intended here was the same as yours, but much less well elaborated. I agree these terms have not been clearly defined by us ever, and perhaps we should add a reference guide somewhere on the PSI site or in the mzid 1.2 spec doc we can refer to when we say "distinct peptide", "PSM" etc. -----Original Message----- From: Seymour, Sean L [ <mailto:Sea...@ab...> mailto:Sea...@ab...] Sent: 26 February 2014 16:50 To: Jones, Andy; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: RE: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi all, If we're going to go down the very useful road of capturing attributes at the level of the peptide, I think we need to very clearly define what we mean by a peptide. To anyone with a chemistry background like myself, a peptide would mean a structurally unique molecule. Different charges states of this molecule are not different peptides, they are derivative states that arise from the analytical process in the mass spec. Different modification states of a sequence are different peptides. Different arrangements of the same modifications on the same sequence are different peptides. The same exact match to two different spectra is one peptide, not two peptides. While this view may seem obvious to some of you, there is a great range of how this term is used in my experience, including violation of all of the previous specific statements. Perhaps we've already clearly defined 'peptide' somewhere, and I don't need to say this, but I think this is very important so I want to be sure. I'm very much in favor of including concepts at this level since it is more aligned with the physical analyte, sheds redundancy complications, and is more useful when moving to targeted analyses via MRM or DIA. It might be useful to develop/collect all our terms at this level to be sure we've defined them right. Many concepts at the spectrum level have an analog at the peptide level so it may be useful to map this out as well - ex RT of MS2 trigger vs. RT of the peptide apex of elution. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [ <mailto:And...@li...> mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:24 AM To: 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Thanks for this Gerhard. Apologies, I discovered a further term which we would like added (discussed here: <http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=80> http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=80): Term: "best PSM per peptide" No value slot Def: "To support peptide-level statistical approaches or scores, this term SHOULD be used to annotate the best scoring PSM reporting on a given distinct peptide (sequence and modifications distinct)" -----Original Message----- From: Gerhard Mayer [ <mailto:Ger...@ru...> mailto:Ger...@ru...] Sent: 26 February 2014 14:45 To: <mailto:psi...@li...> psi...@li...; <mailto:psi...@li...> psi...@li...; Mass spectrometry standard development Subject: [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains two new CV terms for flagging the SpectrumIdentificationLists in mzIdentML version 1.2. Changed CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002438 name: spectrum identification list result details def: "Information about the list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList)." [PSI:PI] relationship: part_of MS:1001000 ! spectrum interpretation [Term] id: MS:1002439 name: final PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum must not be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002440 name: intermediate PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is not the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. This term should be used when results are provided from multiple search engines for the results from each search engine before they are combined to give consensus identifications. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum may be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: <mailto:ger...@ru...> ger...@ru... Web: <http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de> http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. <http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-pi-dev mailing list <mailto:Psi...@li...> Psi...@li... <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-pi-dev> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-pi-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. <http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-dev mailing list <mailto:Psi...@li...> Psi...@li... <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. <http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktr k> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-vocab mailing list <mailto:Psi...@li...> Psi...@li... <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-vocab> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-vocab ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. <http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktr k> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-dev mailing list <mailto:Psi...@li...> Psi...@li... <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev |
From: Jones, A. <And...@li...> - 2014-02-27 13:45:40
|
Hi all, Wow - I didn't realise my request for a new CV term would open such a can of worms :-) Probably it makes sense to defer this update (support for peptide-level stats) and discuss as an agenda item at the PSI meeting in April, then do as a minor update to mzid 1.2 at a later stage? I want to get mzid 1.2 in process ASAP, and I don't think we'll get this resolved very easily, since as you mention there are lots of different ways of doing "peptide-level stats", and we should try get it right. Cheers Andy -----Original Message----- From: Seymour, Sean L [mailto:Sea...@ab...] Sent: 26 February 2014 17:55 To: Eric Deutsch; Mass spectrometry standard development; psi...@li...; psi...@li... Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-vocab] [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi Eric, I like your breakdown of the concepts, but not all the names. Your 'distinct peptide' is really a 'sequence' to me. And I'm not too crazy about using 'modified peptide' as the term for what I described as my view of what a 'peptide' is, particularly because this would have to apply to unmodified peptides as well. While I find myself using them, I find the modifiers 'distinct' and 'unique' to be ambiguous as well, since these are used by some framings of protein inference to refer to a peptide or sequence's degree of specificity to just one protein. I guess this is where I come back to 'peptide' and 'sequence' having the most straightforward meaning if we insist on clear definitions most consistent with what those words really mean and would be understood to mean outside of our little domain. I'm fine with 'PSM' and 'Peptide ion' for your first two, but would prefer just 'Peptide' and 'Sequence' for the last two. A peptide is an actual compound that has a structural formula and a sequence has...well, a sequence. It's also not completely clear to me from the definition of the third if you count different arrangements of the same mods on the same sequence as different peptides. From the chemist's perspective, they are different. They would come in different vials from a different number in a catalog and have different structural formulae. I think that's what you mean, but it could be spelled out a little more. I definitely think we can agree on terms but allow room for slightly varied concepts for things deeply interior to our domain. We were should really try to agree and use things consistently is where our domain interfaces with other who don't understand all the fine points of mass spec and proteomics. This is where I think the terms 'peptide' and 'sequence' are particularly important. No biologist should ever have to know or care about a PSM or how many charge states a peptide ionizes to in a mass spec. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Eric Deutsch [mailto:ede...@sy...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:29 AM To: Mass spectrometry standard development; Seymour, Sean L; psi...@li...; psi...@li... Cc: Eric Deutsch Subject: RE: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo FWIW, these are the terms we try to use (PeptideAtlas/TPP): PSM - peptide-spectrum match - one instance of a spectrum matched to a specific peptide ion. peptide ion - one species of distinct peptide with a specific charge state and mass-modification configuration. modified peptide - one species of distinct peptide with a specific mass-modification configuration, but irrespective of charge. distinct peptide - a distinct sequence of amino acids irrespective of mass modifications or charge. We try not to use peptide by itself because it is so ambiguous. Do you think it's possible to all agree on a set of terms and definitions? E -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:57 AM To: 'Seymour, Sean L'; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Totally agree with what you're saying here - I think my concept of peptide I intended here was the same as yours, but much less well elaborated. I agree these terms have not been clearly defined by us ever, and perhaps we should add a reference guide somewhere on the PSI site or in the mzid 1.2 spec doc we can refer to when we say "distinct peptide", "PSM" etc. -----Original Message----- From: Seymour, Sean L [mailto:Sea...@ab...] Sent: 26 February 2014 16:50 To: Jones, Andy; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: RE: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi all, If we're going to go down the very useful road of capturing attributes at the level of the peptide, I think we need to very clearly define what we mean by a peptide. To anyone with a chemistry background like myself, a peptide would mean a structurally unique molecule. Different charges states of this molecule are not different peptides, they are derivative states that arise from the analytical process in the mass spec. Different modification states of a sequence are different peptides. Different arrangements of the same modifications on the same sequence are different peptides. The same exact match to two different spectra is one peptide, not two peptides. While this view may seem obvious to some of you, there is a great range of how this term is used in my experience, including violation of all of the previous specific statements. Perhaps we've already clearly defined 'peptide' somewhere, and I don't need to say this, but I think this is very important so I want to be sure. I'm very much in favor of including concepts at this level since it is more aligned with the physical analyte, sheds redundancy complications, and is more useful when moving to targeted analyses via MRM or DIA. It might be useful to develop/collect all our terms at this level to be sure we've defined them right. Many concepts at the spectrum level have an analog at the peptide level so it may be useful to map this out as well - ex RT of MS2 trigger vs. RT of the peptide apex of elution. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:24 AM To: 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Thanks for this Gerhard. Apologies, I discovered a further term which we would like added (discussed here: http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=80): Term: "best PSM per peptide" No value slot Def: "To support peptide-level statistical approaches or scores, this term SHOULD be used to annotate the best scoring PSM reporting on a given distinct peptide (sequence and modifications distinct)" -----Original Message----- From: Gerhard Mayer [mailto:Ger...@ru...] Sent: 26 February 2014 14:45 To: psi...@li...; psi...@li...; Mass spectrometry standard development Subject: [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains two new CV terms for flagging the SpectrumIdentificationLists in mzIdentML version 1.2. Changed CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002438 name: spectrum identification list result details def: "Information about the list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList)." [PSI:PI] relationship: part_of MS:1001000 ! spectrum interpretation [Term] id: MS:1002439 name: final PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum must not be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002440 name: intermediate PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is not the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. This term should be used when results are provided from multiple search engines for the results from each search engine before they are combined to give consensus identifications. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum may be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-pi-dev mailing list Psi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-pi-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-dev mailing list Psi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-vocab mailing list Psi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-vocab |
From: Seymour, S. L <Sea...@ab...> - 2014-02-26 17:54:43
|
Hi Eric, I like your breakdown of the concepts, but not all the names. Your 'distinct peptide' is really a 'sequence' to me. And I'm not too crazy about using 'modified peptide' as the term for what I described as my view of what a 'peptide' is, particularly because this would have to apply to unmodified peptides as well. While I find myself using them, I find the modifiers 'distinct' and 'unique' to be ambiguous as well, since these are used by some framings of protein inference to refer to a peptide or sequence's degree of specificity to just one protein. I guess this is where I come back to 'peptide' and 'sequence' having the most straightforward meaning if we insist on clear definitions most consistent with what those words really mean and would be understood to mean outside of our little domain. I'm fine with 'PSM' and 'Peptide ion' for your first two, but would prefer just 'Peptide' and 'Sequence' for the last two. A peptide is an actual compound that has a structural formula and a sequence has...well, a sequence. It's also not completely clear to me from the definition of the third if you count different arrangements of the same mods on the same sequence as different peptides. From the chemist's perspective, they are different. They would come in different vials from a different number in a catalog and have different structural formulae. I think that's what you mean, but it could be spelled out a little more. I definitely think we can agree on terms but allow room for slightly varied concepts for things deeply interior to our domain. We were should really try to agree and use things consistently is where our domain interfaces with other who don't understand all the fine points of mass spec and proteomics. This is where I think the terms 'peptide' and 'sequence' are particularly important. No biologist should ever have to know or care about a PSM or how many charge states a peptide ionizes to in a mass spec. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Eric Deutsch [mailto:ede...@sy...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:29 AM To: Mass spectrometry standard development; Seymour, Sean L; psi...@li...; psi...@li... Cc: Eric Deutsch Subject: RE: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo FWIW, these are the terms we try to use (PeptideAtlas/TPP): PSM - peptide-spectrum match - one instance of a spectrum matched to a specific peptide ion. peptide ion - one species of distinct peptide with a specific charge state and mass-modification configuration. modified peptide - one species of distinct peptide with a specific mass-modification configuration, but irrespective of charge. distinct peptide - a distinct sequence of amino acids irrespective of mass modifications or charge. We try not to use peptide by itself because it is so ambiguous. Do you think it's possible to all agree on a set of terms and definitions? E -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:57 AM To: 'Seymour, Sean L'; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Totally agree with what you're saying here - I think my concept of peptide I intended here was the same as yours, but much less well elaborated. I agree these terms have not been clearly defined by us ever, and perhaps we should add a reference guide somewhere on the PSI site or in the mzid 1.2 spec doc we can refer to when we say "distinct peptide", "PSM" etc. -----Original Message----- From: Seymour, Sean L [mailto:Sea...@ab...] Sent: 26 February 2014 16:50 To: Jones, Andy; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: RE: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi all, If we're going to go down the very useful road of capturing attributes at the level of the peptide, I think we need to very clearly define what we mean by a peptide. To anyone with a chemistry background like myself, a peptide would mean a structurally unique molecule. Different charges states of this molecule are not different peptides, they are derivative states that arise from the analytical process in the mass spec. Different modification states of a sequence are different peptides. Different arrangements of the same modifications on the same sequence are different peptides. The same exact match to two different spectra is one peptide, not two peptides. While this view may seem obvious to some of you, there is a great range of how this term is used in my experience, including violation of all of the previous specific statements. Perhaps we've already clearly defined 'peptide' somewhere, and I don't need to say this, but I think this is very important so I want to be sure. I'm very much in favor of including concepts at this level since it is more aligned with the physical analyte, sheds redundancy complications, and is more useful when moving to targeted analyses via MRM or DIA. It might be useful to develop/collect all our terms at this level to be sure we've defined them right. Many concepts at the spectrum level have an analog at the peptide level so it may be useful to map this out as well - ex RT of MS2 trigger vs. RT of the peptide apex of elution. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:24 AM To: 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Thanks for this Gerhard. Apologies, I discovered a further term which we would like added (discussed here: http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=80): Term: "best PSM per peptide" No value slot Def: "To support peptide-level statistical approaches or scores, this term SHOULD be used to annotate the best scoring PSM reporting on a given distinct peptide (sequence and modifications distinct)" -----Original Message----- From: Gerhard Mayer [mailto:Ger...@ru...] Sent: 26 February 2014 14:45 To: psi...@li...; psi...@li...; Mass spectrometry standard development Subject: [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains two new CV terms for flagging the SpectrumIdentificationLists in mzIdentML version 1.2. Changed CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002438 name: spectrum identification list result details def: "Information about the list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList)." [PSI:PI] relationship: part_of MS:1001000 ! spectrum interpretation [Term] id: MS:1002439 name: final PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum must not be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002440 name: intermediate PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is not the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. This term should be used when results are provided from multiple search engines for the results from each search engine before they are combined to give consensus identifications. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum may be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-pi-dev mailing list Psi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-pi-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-dev mailing list Psi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. |
From: Eric D. <ede...@sy...> - 2014-02-26 17:29:50
|
FWIW, these are the terms we try to use (PeptideAtlas/TPP): PSM - peptide-spectrum match - one instance of a spectrum matched to a specific peptide ion. peptide ion - one species of distinct peptide with a specific charge state and mass-modification configuration. modified peptide - one species of distinct peptide with a specific mass-modification configuration, but irrespective of charge. distinct peptide - a distinct sequence of amino acids irrespective of mass modifications or charge. We try not to use peptide by itself because it is so ambiguous. Do you think it's possible to all agree on a set of terms and definitions? E -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:57 AM To: 'Seymour, Sean L'; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-ms-dev] [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Totally agree with what you're saying here - I think my concept of peptide I intended here was the same as yours, but much less well elaborated. I agree these terms have not been clearly defined by us ever, and perhaps we should add a reference guide somewhere on the PSI site or in the mzid 1.2 spec doc we can refer to when we say "distinct peptide", "PSM" etc. -----Original Message----- From: Seymour, Sean L [mailto:Sea...@ab...] Sent: 26 February 2014 16:50 To: Jones, Andy; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: RE: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi all, If we're going to go down the very useful road of capturing attributes at the level of the peptide, I think we need to very clearly define what we mean by a peptide. To anyone with a chemistry background like myself, a peptide would mean a structurally unique molecule. Different charges states of this molecule are not different peptides, they are derivative states that arise from the analytical process in the mass spec. Different modification states of a sequence are different peptides. Different arrangements of the same modifications on the same sequence are different peptides. The same exact match to two different spectra is one peptide, not two peptides. While this view may seem obvious to some of you, there is a great range of how this term is used in my experience, including violation of all of the previous specific statements. Perhaps we've already clearly defined 'peptide' somewhere, and I don't need to say this, but I think this is very important so I want to be sure. I'm very much in favor of including concepts at this level since it is more aligned with the physical analyte, sheds redundancy complications, and is more useful when moving to targeted analyses via MRM or DIA. It might be useful to develop/collect all our terms at this level to be sure we've defined them right. Many concepts at the spectrum level have an analog at the peptide level so it may be useful to map this out as well - ex RT of MS2 trigger vs. RT of the peptide apex of elution. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:24 AM To: 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Thanks for this Gerhard. Apologies, I discovered a further term which we would like added (discussed here: http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=80): Term: "best PSM per peptide" No value slot Def: "To support peptide-level statistical approaches or scores, this term SHOULD be used to annotate the best scoring PSM reporting on a given distinct peptide (sequence and modifications distinct)" -----Original Message----- From: Gerhard Mayer [mailto:Ger...@ru...] Sent: 26 February 2014 14:45 To: psi...@li...; psi...@li...; Mass spectrometry standard development Subject: [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains two new CV terms for flagging the SpectrumIdentificationLists in mzIdentML version 1.2. Changed CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002438 name: spectrum identification list result details def: "Information about the list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList)." [PSI:PI] relationship: part_of MS:1001000 ! spectrum interpretation [Term] id: MS:1002439 name: final PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum must not be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002440 name: intermediate PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is not the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. This term should be used when results are provided from multiple search engines for the results from each search engine before they are combined to give consensus identifications. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum may be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-pi-dev mailing list Psi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-pi-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clkt rk _______________________________________________ Psidev-ms-dev mailing list Psi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-ms-dev |
From: Jones, A. <And...@li...> - 2014-02-26 16:57:37
|
Totally agree with what you're saying here - I think my concept of peptide I intended here was the same as yours, but much less well elaborated. I agree these terms have not been clearly defined by us ever, and perhaps we should add a reference guide somewhere on the PSI site or in the mzid 1.2 spec doc we can refer to when we say "distinct peptide", "PSM" etc. -----Original Message----- From: Seymour, Sean L [mailto:Sea...@ab...] Sent: 26 February 2014 16:50 To: Jones, Andy; 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: RE: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Hi all, If we're going to go down the very useful road of capturing attributes at the level of the peptide, I think we need to very clearly define what we mean by a peptide. To anyone with a chemistry background like myself, a peptide would mean a structurally unique molecule. Different charges states of this molecule are not different peptides, they are derivative states that arise from the analytical process in the mass spec. Different modification states of a sequence are different peptides. Different arrangements of the same modifications on the same sequence are different peptides. The same exact match to two different spectra is one peptide, not two peptides. While this view may seem obvious to some of you, there is a great range of how this term is used in my experience, including violation of all of the previous specific statements. Perhaps we've already clearly defined 'peptide' somewhere, and I don't need to say this, but I think this is very important so I want to be sure. I'm very much in favor of including concepts at this level since it is more aligned with the physical analyte, sheds redundancy complications, and is more useful when moving to targeted analyses via MRM or DIA. It might be useful to develop/collect all our terms at this level to be sure we've defined them right. Many concepts at the spectrum level have an analog at the peptide level so it may be useful to map this out as well - ex RT of MS2 trigger vs. RT of the peptide apex of elution. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:24 AM To: 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Thanks for this Gerhard. Apologies, I discovered a further term which we would like added (discussed here: http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=80): Term: "best PSM per peptide" No value slot Def: "To support peptide-level statistical approaches or scores, this term SHOULD be used to annotate the best scoring PSM reporting on a given distinct peptide (sequence and modifications distinct)" -----Original Message----- From: Gerhard Mayer [mailto:Ger...@ru...] Sent: 26 February 2014 14:45 To: psi...@li...; psi...@li...; Mass spectrometry standard development Subject: [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains two new CV terms for flagging the SpectrumIdentificationLists in mzIdentML version 1.2. Changed CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002438 name: spectrum identification list result details def: "Information about the list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList)." [PSI:PI] relationship: part_of MS:1001000 ! spectrum interpretation [Term] id: MS:1002439 name: final PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum must not be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002440 name: intermediate PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is not the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. This term should be used when results are provided from multiple search engines for the results from each search engine before they are combined to give consensus identifications. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum may be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Psidev-pi-dev mailing list Psi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-pi-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. |
From: Seymour, S. L <Sea...@ab...> - 2014-02-26 16:50:21
|
Hi all, If we're going to go down the very useful road of capturing attributes at the level of the peptide, I think we need to very clearly define what we mean by a peptide. To anyone with a chemistry background like myself, a peptide would mean a structurally unique molecule. Different charges states of this molecule are not different peptides, they are derivative states that arise from the analytical process in the mass spec. Different modification states of a sequence are different peptides. Different arrangements of the same modifications on the same sequence are different peptides. The same exact match to two different spectra is one peptide, not two peptides. While this view may seem obvious to some of you, there is a great range of how this term is used in my experience, including violation of all of the previous specific statements. Perhaps we've already clearly defined 'peptide' somewhere, and I don't need to say this, but I think this is very important so I want to be sure. I'm very much in favor of including concepts at this level since it is more aligned with the physical analyte, sheds redundancy complications, and is more useful when moving to targeted analyses via MRM or DIA. It might be useful to develop/collect all our terms at this level to be sure we've defined them right. Many concepts at the spectrum level have an analog at the peptide level so it may be useful to map this out as well - ex RT of MS2 trigger vs. RT of the peptide apex of elution. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Andy [mailto:And...@li...] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:24 AM To: 'psi...@li...'; 'psi...@li...'; 'Mass spectrometry standard development' Subject: Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Thanks for this Gerhard. Apologies, I discovered a further term which we would like added (discussed here: http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=80): Term: "best PSM per peptide" No value slot Def: "To support peptide-level statistical approaches or scores, this term SHOULD be used to annotate the best scoring PSM reporting on a given distinct peptide (sequence and modifications distinct)" -----Original Message----- From: Gerhard Mayer [mailto:Ger...@ru...] Sent: 26 February 2014 14:45 To: psi...@li...; psi...@li...; Mass spectrometry standard development Subject: [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains two new CV terms for flagging the SpectrumIdentificationLists in mzIdentML version 1.2. Changed CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002438 name: spectrum identification list result details def: "Information about the list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList)." [PSI:PI] relationship: part_of MS:1001000 ! spectrum interpretation [Term] id: MS:1002439 name: final PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum must not be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002440 name: intermediate PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is not the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. This term should be used when results are provided from multiple search engines for the results from each search engine before they are combined to give consensus identifications. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum may be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Psidev-pi-dev mailing list Psi...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-pi-dev Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. |
From: Jones, A. <And...@li...> - 2014-02-26 16:24:35
|
Thanks for this Gerhard. Apologies, I discovered a further term which we would like added (discussed here: http://code.google.com/p/psi-pi/issues/detail?id=80): Term: "best PSM per peptide" No value slot Def: "To support peptide-level statistical approaches or scores, this term SHOULD be used to annotate the best scoring PSM reporting on a given distinct peptide (sequence and modifications distinct)" -----Original Message----- From: Gerhard Mayer [mailto:Ger...@ru...] Sent: 26 February 2014 14:45 To: psi...@li...; psi...@li...; Mass spectrometry standard development Subject: [Psidev-ms-vocab] Release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains two new CV terms for flagging the SpectrumIdentificationLists in mzIdentML version 1.2. Changed CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002438 name: spectrum identification list result details def: "Information about the list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList)." [PSI:PI] relationship: part_of MS:1001000 ! spectrum interpretation [Term] id: MS:1002439 name: final PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum must not be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002440 name: intermediate PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is not the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. This term should be used when results are provided from multiple search engines for the results from each search engine before they are combined to give consensus identifications. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum may be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de |
From: Gerhard M. <Ger...@ru...> - 2014-02-26 14:44:47
|
Dear proteomics community, attached you find the release candidate 3.61.0_rc1 of the psi-ms.obo file. It contains two new CV terms for flagging the SpectrumIdentificationLists in mzIdentML version 1.2. Changed CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ===================================================== No changed CV terms New CV terms in version 3.61.0_rc1 of psi-ms.obo: ================================================= [Term] id: MS:1002438 name: spectrum identification list result details def: "Information about the list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList)." [PSI:PI] relationship: part_of MS:1001000 ! spectrum interpretation [Term] id: MS:1002439 name: final PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum must not be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details [Term] id: MS:1002440 name: intermediate PSM list def: "A flag on a list of PSMs (SpectrumIdentificationList) to indicate that this is not the final set of identifications to be interpreted by consuming software. This term should be used when results are provided from multiple search engines for the results from each search engine before they are combined to give consensus identifications. Amongst the set of SpectrumIdentificationList(s) that are flagged with the term, each spectrum may be referenced from more than one SpectrumIdentificationResult." [PSI:PI] is_a: MS:1002438 ! spectrum identification list result details Best Regards, Gerhard -- --- Dipl. Inform. med., Dipl. Wirtsch. Inf. Gerhard Mayer Bioinformatics / Biostatistics Medizinisches-Proteom-Center (MPC) Ruhr-Universität Bochum Zentrum für klinische Forschung I (ZKF I), E.049a Universitätsstraße 150 D-44801 Bochum Phone: +49(0)234/32-21006 Fax: +49(0)234/32-14554 Email: ger...@ru... Web: http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de |