Re: [Psidev-qc-dev] Please review ELIXIR BioHackathon instructions & tasks

[Wout B. <wou...@ua...>]

Awesome, thanks Yasset.

Yes, I don't expect that we will fully finish all tasks. The different options are more so that people can pick a project that most appeals to them. I agree that mzQC export is definitely a priority.

Best,
Wout
________________________________
From: Yasset Perez-Riverol <ypr...@gm...>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 17:03
To: Wout Bittremieux <wou...@ua...>
Cc: psi...@li... <psi...@li...>
Subject: Re: Please review ELIXIR BioHackathon instructions & tasks


CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


I have given a quick view. My only question is that the amount of tasks looks heavy for a hackathon of five days, but I also have to say that I don’t know the specs of BioHackathon2025. If you have enough people, you can try to achieve this.

>From my point of view, having support for mzQC in MultiQC and an IDFree scalable workflow and MultiQC+mzQC report that we can try to deploy in prod will be a dream that PRIDE has tried for years.

Regards,
Yasset

Yasset Perez-Riverol
Team Coordinator PRIDE resources
Proteomics Services, EMBL-EBI
ypr...@gm...

On 28 Oct 2025, at 15:27, Wout Bittremieux <wou...@ua...> wrote:

Hi all,

I've prepared the hackathon materials here: https://github.com/MS-Quality-Hub/biohackathon2025

Could you please give everything a careful pass to ensure:

  1.
Completeness: all info participants need is present (setup, tasks, links, examples).
  2.
Clarity: instructions and task scopes make sense for newcomers.
  3.
Technical accuracy: commands, repositories/branches, CV terms, and validation steps are correct.

Feel free to edit directly, open a PR with proposed changes, or send comments to me if that's easier.

Thanks,
Wout