From: David T. <dav...@pa...> - 2021-05-05 06:11:27
|
Hi, all. This afternoon I am teaching essentials of proteome informatics to the local Ph.D. students, so I will not be able to chair. Mathias, could you manage finalizing our last details? I want to finalize the spec at the earliest opportunity. Thanks, Dave From: Bittremieux, Wout via Psidev-qc-dev <psi...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:32 AM To: psi...@li... Subject: [Psidev-qc-dev] Upcoming teleconference 5/5 Dear colleagues, We have our next teleconference tomorrow, Wednesday May 5, at 14h00 GMT (15h00 London, 16h00 Western Europe, 7h00 San Diego). Note that we have decided to meet bi-weekly to finish the specification document and manuscript(s) discussed during the Spring Meeting. You can connect to our teleconference on Zoom through the following link: https://uchealth.zoom.us/j/92419363577?pwd=WVp5Q3FXNU9vaVdJT0ZNRllXWlN3Zz09 (Password: 012575) Agenda items: Action points from the last call: ✔️ Section 9.3: Specify how non-computable numbers (NaN, Inf) should be encoded. ✔️ Section 4.1: Add a brief introduction to OBO and OBO Foundry. ✔️ Section 4.1: Specify that the MS CV and QC CV are developed in parallel (but not planned to be merged). ✔️ Section 4.1.1: Refer to the GitHub issue tracker to request new CV terms. - @julian: Figure out how we can submit the CV to the Ontology Lookup Service. - Mention that an mzML file may report that a corresponding mzQC file has been developed that incorporates it. Create a small mzML–mzQC example file on GitHub. - Include examples with both nativeID and USI specifiers. ✔️ Section 5.3: Mention directly including metrics in an mzTab file. ✔️ Section 5.5: SDRF can help to define the study design to inform the calculation of QC metrics. ✔️ PR 128: Provide a userParam type for temporary metrics that don't have a CV term (yet). Please review! ✔️ Specify the type of arrays by replacing "array" by "array of TYPE". - @mwalzer: Address syntactic and semantic validation of mzQC files. ✔️ @wout: Change to a CC BY-NC license. Depending on whether we have more time: - Evaluate examples on GitHub. Which examples are still missing and do we need more? - Semantic validation (see Slack and issue 51). Please communicate other agenda items to the mailing list. Best, Wout |