Re: [Psidev-pi-dev] [Psidev-ms-dev] New term needed for timsTOF Flex instrument

[Eric D. <eri...@is...>]

I don’t know much about this instrument itself, but seems reasonable to me.



My only suggested change is to remove the apostrophe. It is incorrectly
used and unnecessary. But I also notice that all Bruker instruments have
this (so Juan was just following the pattern, okay). But I vote that we fix
this everywhere in the CV. i.e. s/Daltonics’/Daltonics/g



Thermo doesn’t have apostrophes, Waters doesn’t have apostrophes. I assume
the intent was to imply a possessive, but I propose we strip that for all
Bruker models. It’s only in the definition anyway, so should not affect
software.



Thanks,

Eric





*From:* Juan Antonio Vizcaino <ju...@eb...>
*Sent:* Thursday, March 5, 2020 3:46 AM
*To:* psi...@li...
*Cc:* psi...@li...; Mass spectrometry standard
development <psi...@li...>; Deepti Jaiswal Kundu <
ja...@eb...>
*Subject:* [Psidev-ms-dev] New term needed for timsTOF Flex instrument



Dear all,



We have a submitter that has generated data coming from an timsTOF fleX
instrument.



This term is not yet in the PSI MS CV. The one that is there is for the
timsTOF Pro (MS:1003005). So I am proposing to add it to the CV.



[Term]
id: MS:1xxxxx
name: timsTOF fleX
def: "Bruker Daltonics' timsTOF fleX." [PSI:MS]
is_a: MS:1000122 ! Bruker Daltonics instrument model





Thanks in advance,



Juan