From: Mathias W. <wa...@in...> - 2017-04-12 11:12:33
|
Dear all, The PSI annual meeting agenda for 'our' track looks like this right now: Track 4 - Quality Control Tue - morning: qcML / minimal requirements Minimal reporting requirements Tue - afternoon: Software support Implementation in repositories Wed - morning: Break-outs based on interests Break-outs based on interests Summary, wrap-up I would, however, very much like to discuss how we are going to integrate our collection of metrics into the cv (or do the CV from scratch), the cv into the schema and the minimum requirements in all of this *before* we go on about software and repository integration. Depending on how detailed the cv terms are going to be in 'final' will influence how lax we can be on the schema side. Because, and I will stress this ever so often, one goal should be machine readability *without* ethereal knowledge of how some certain bit of data is meant. In the end, we want to support the widespread adoption of (comparable?) quality metrics for which it might be detrimental if reported metrics are ambiguous/unintelligible without the context of the particular software. TL;DR: I suggest to have a CV definitions session on Tuesday afternoon and move the other points thereafter. Please respond soon, deadline for agenda fix and print is soon (this week!), otherwise, I will go ahead with the changes. best, mths |