Re: [Psidev-qc-dev] qcML format evolution

[walzer <wa...@in...>]

Dear all,


you may have seen the activity on github regarding the metrics 
definitions as implemented in one way or the other by previous software 
and the mailing list thread about new metrics.


My suggestion would be, that we have our first telco next week or the 
following to discuss the metrics and their representation.

What about the following dates?

Tue. 21.02. - 14.00 CEST

Tue. 21.02. - 18.00 CEST (hangouts only)

Wed 22.02. - 14.00 CEST
Wed 22.02. - 18.00 CEST (hangouts only)

Mon. 27.02. - 14.00 CEST

Mon 27.02. - 18.00 CEST (hangouts only)

Tue 28.02. - 14.00 CEST


I would suggest also to have the discussion via hangouts, alternatively 
via EBI teleconference system (however there, someone has to be 
physically at EBI, which excludes the evening dates).

If you want to participate, please take the doodle 
(http://doodle.com/poll/bv36kwe3hfmgwm8v) so we can find a date that 
fits most. If you cannot make any of the dates, please let me know.

best,
   Mathias

On 07.02.2017 19:24, Mathias Walzer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as the last two post were closely related to new metrics, I'll create 
> a new thread for metrics ([Psidev-qc-dev] metrics) and forward 
> (repost) the respective posts.
>
> Now, as no feedback whatsoever about the changes (after last spring 
> meeting, that is > 0.7) reached me, I will go ahead and make this a 
> pre-release on which we can base our next step on - metrics 
> development and refinement. But keep in mind that it is pretty hard to 
> define a community standard format without feedback.
>
> I'd like to take this opportunity to paraphrase my latter question
> > And shall we have a regular telco/hangouts/... (bi- or tri-weekly)?
>
> We should have a regular teleconference. We can use google hangouts 
> or, after consulting with Juanan, the EBI 0800 telco system for that. 
> I will circulate date suggestions soon.
>
> I added a visual review to github a while back for folks to make it 
> easier to express their ideas/opinions on the _next iteration_ of 
> schema evolution. 
> (https://github.com/HUPO-PSI/qcML-development/tree/master/schema/v0_0_9)
>
>
>
> best,
>
>   Mathias
>