Re: [Psidev-qc-dev] HUPO-PSI QC WG manuscript

[Reza S. <rez...@eb...>]

Hi Wout,

If you share reviewers comment as a gDoc, can help with that if needed. We are also working on capturing various types of QC within Metabolights and metabolomics, a guid on how to report it. We have now several use cases, but  it is a work in progress. So it could help with the comment.

> depositing QC data in public repositories

Best Wishes,
Reza


> On 23 Nov 2016, at 08:31, Bittremieux Wout <wou...@ua...> wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> In the meantime we have received the reviewer's comments for our manuscript.
> 
> Two reviewers suggested a few clarifications, and these changes should be relatively straightforward.
> 
> A third reviewer expected more tangible results though, resulting in a major revision.
> The main goal of the manuscript is to solicit community interest to ensure that our work on QC has broad public support, which is somewhat at odds with presenting concrete results at this stage already. However, we should try to highlight some concrete use cases to show the value of our working group. Specifically, as mentioned by the reviewer, giving an overview of which types of QC metrics are relevant for various different experiments and detailing how a concrete pipeline of QC tools can improve experimental workflows would be beneficial. Additionally, the interplay between depositing QC data in public repositories and publication guidelines was suggested as a point of attention.
> 
> We will mull over potential improvements for the manuscript in the next few days. There are multiple people involved with expert knowledge on some of the mentioned topics, so as always any suggestions are more than welcome.
> 
> Regards,
> Wout
> 
>> On 13 Oct 2016, at 08:29, Bittremieux Wout <wou...@ua...> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello everyone,
>> 
>> It took some time, but we managed to finish the QC working group manuscript. I would like to ask (at least) the co-authors to go through it once more in detail and let me know any final comments.
>> We aim to submit the manuscript by the end of October, so I would like to request your comments within the next two weeks, by 27 October at the latest.
>> 
>> As a reminder, the manuscript can be accessed here.
>> 
>> We are planning to submit the manuscript to Anal. Chem., to reach a wide audience of both proteomics and metabolomics people. Some suggestions for potential reviewers would come in handy, so if you have suitable reviewers in mind, please let me know.
>> 
>> Thank you all for your contributions.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Wout
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
>> Psidev-qc-dev mailing list
>> Psi...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-qc-dev
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Psidev-qc-dev mailing list
> Psi...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-qc-dev