[Psidev-qc-dev] qcML format evolution

[Tabb, D. P. <dt...@su...>]

Hi, all!

We had such a lot of interesting topics that arose during our meeting in April.  Now that we are rapidly approaching the submission of our group announcement whitepaper (courtesy of consistent labors by Wout Bittremieux), I wanted to check in on various other questions that arose during Ghent:


1)      Mathias, you received a lot of feedback on the qcML format at our meeting.  Could you describe the nature of changes that you have already made to the format along with the set of topics that still need addressing in the months to come?

2)      Reza, we have talked about various partners in the metabolomics community who may be assisting us as we move forward with our work.  Could you identify the primary people who will be most closely connected with the quality control effort?

3)      All, I spoke with a researcher who was tightly associated with the development of SWATH technologies (a type of DIA).  He was interested in seeing QC tools for the SWATH platform.  Could someone help me remember his name?  I'd like to see if that group has already roughed out some metrics in the DIA space.

4)      Wout, thank you for your persistence in the announcement white paper (https://www.overleaf.com/5671898jfvtyd).  In the month and a half together at Cape Town that we have remaining, I hope to get a better grip on the iMonDB (https://bitbucket.org/proteinspector/imondb/wiki/Home) framework.

Thanks!
Dave Tabb