Re: [Psidev-qc-dev] PSI QC Announcement Draft

[Lennart M. <len...@vi...>]

Hello,


I took the liberty of going through the text (which is great!), and made 
a few additions, adding three references in the process.

I also put a comment at line 257-260, where i suggest a change in a 
sentence that probably needs a look from whoever wrote the original.


Cheers,

lnnrt.

On 19/08/2016 20:00, Reza Salek wrote:
> Hello Daivd, all.
>
>
>> On 1 Aug 2016, at 17:16, Tabb, David, Prof <dt...@su...
>> <mailto:dt...@su...>> <dt...@su... <mailto:dt...@su...>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, all.
>>
>> I hope that our full team is now on the QC Dev mailing list.  I should
>> probably figure out how to get the roster from SourceForge.
>>
>> I hope by now everyone has had a look at the draft of the QC
>> Announcement draft at Overleaf
>> (https://www.overleaf.com/5671898jfvtyd).  *Wout* did some key work
>> getting us off the ground with an initial draft, and I think a few of
>> us have made contributions to that draft, as well.
>>
>> *Reza*, I would like to request that you help us with some
>> concreteness in metabolomics experimental methods.
>
> I have added several paragraphs to the manuscript,  covering role and
> types of QC and QA samples in metabolomics. Also added tools, that I
> hope would support qcML, as well added the initiative within the
> Metabolomics Society that can support or we are coordinating with (Task
> groups). Please have a looking and let me know if more details are
> needed. I will be on holiday next week but back in September.
>
>
>> We already mention a variety of techniques in proteomics into which we
>> hope to expand QC (SRM, iTRAQ, DIA, MALDI).
>
> specially target and un-target methods but not much different from
> proteomics
>> We haven’t done the same for metabolomics.  Presumably data-dependent
>> acquisition is not the dominant paradigm for metabolomics experiments;
>
> A work in progress ….
>
> Best Wishes
> Reza
>
>> we would like to sketch out methods in metabolomic mass spectrometry
>> that we hope to keep in mind as QC moves forward.
>>
>> I wanted to single out *Dave* for failing to navigate the HUPO 2016
>> abstract submission site.  We learned two weeks after abstracts were
>> due that the abstract I thought had been submitted had not, in fact,
>> been sent (one must hit the submission button once, wait for the
>> refresh, and then a second time).  Thankfully, *Eric* *Deutsch* caught
>> the mistake when searching for our abstract for inclusion in his
>> panel!  We were able to do a late submission courtesy of folks in the
>> HUPO office.  I’m sorry for the foul-up, folks.
>>
>> Thank you for all your good work!
>> Dave
>>
>> P.S. I ran QuaMeter today on a pile of RAW files to untangle a mystery
>> about the origin of some files collected before the uniform naming
>> strategy went into effect.  How useful!
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Psidev-qc-dev mailing list
>> Psi...@li...
>> <mailto:Psi...@li...>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-qc-dev
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Psidev-qc-dev mailing list
> Psi...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-qc-dev