Re: [Psidev-qc-dev] PSI QC Announcement Draft

[Reza S. <rez...@eb...>]

Hello Daivd, all.


> On 1 Aug 2016, at 17:16, Tabb, David, Prof <dt...@su...> <dt...@su...> wrote:
> 
> Hi, all.
>  
> I hope that our full team is now on the QC Dev mailing list.  I should probably figure out how to get the roster from SourceForge.
>  
> I hope by now everyone has had a look at the draft of the QC Announcement draft at Overleaf (https://www.overleaf.com/5671898jfvtyd <https://www.overleaf.com/5671898jfvtyd>).  Wout did some key work getting us off the ground with an initial draft, and I think a few of us have made contributions to that draft, as well.
>  
> Reza, I would like to request that you help us with some concreteness in metabolomics experimental methods. 

I have added several paragraphs to the manuscript,  covering role and types of QC and QA samples in metabolomics. Also added tools, that I hope would support qcML, as well added the initiative within the Metabolomics Society that can support or we are coordinating with (Task groups). Please have a looking and let me know if more details are needed. I will be on holiday next week but back in September.


> We already mention a variety of techniques in proteomics into which we hope to expand QC (SRM, iTRAQ, DIA, MALDI). 

specially target and un-target methods but not much different from proteomics
> We haven’t done the same for metabolomics.  Presumably data-dependent acquisition is not the dominant paradigm for metabolomics experiments;

A work in progress ….

Best Wishes
Reza

> we would like to sketch out methods in metabolomic mass spectrometry that we hope to keep in mind as QC moves forward.
>  
> I wanted to single out Dave for failing to navigate the HUPO 2016 abstract submission site.  We learned two weeks after abstracts were due that the abstract I thought had been submitted had not, in fact, been sent (one must hit the submission button once, wait for the refresh, and then a second time).  Thankfully, Eric Deutsch caught the mistake when searching for our abstract for inclusion in his panel!  We were able to do a late submission courtesy of folks in the HUPO office.  I’m sorry for the foul-up, folks.
>  
> Thank you for all your good work!
> Dave
>  
> P.S. I ran QuaMeter today on a pile of RAW files to untangle a mystery about the origin of some files collected before the uniform naming strategy went into effect.  How useful!
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Psidev-qc-dev mailing list
> Psi...@li... <mailto:Psi...@li...>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-qc-dev <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/psidev-qc-dev>